airport/documents/Mesquite Master Plan Final.pdf - The City of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

04MP22-4C-6/17/05 MALSR DECLARED DISTANCES 1/2 Mile Visibility Minimum Takeoff Run Available (TORA) Takeoff Distance Available (TODA) Accelerate Stop Distance Available (ASDA) Landing Distance Available (LDA) LEGEND Airport Property Line C/D-II Runway Safety Area (RSA) C/D-II Object Free Area (OFA) Scyene Scyene Scyene Rd. Rd. Rd. Union Union Union Pacific Pacific Pacific Railroad Railroad Railroad Runway 17 Runway 35 7,370' 7,370' 7,370' 7,370' 7,370' 7,370' 7,000' 7,000' Ultimate Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Ultimate Pavement Airport Blvd. Blvd. Lawson Rd. ASDA / LDA 7,370' 7,370' ASDA / LDA LDA 7,000' 7,000' Existing Runway 17-35 17-35 (5,999' x x 100') Ultimate (7,370' x 100') Airport Property Line Line Berry Berry Berry Rd. Rd. NORTH 1,370' Runway Extension 0 800 1600 SCALE IN FEET 35 3/4 Mile Visibility Minimum Minimum DATE OF PHOTO: 2-3-05 Lead In In Lights Lights Localizer Exhibit 4C AIRFIELD ALTERNATIVE 1
Runway 17, the parallel taxiway would need to be relocated 100 feet to the west, as depicted on the exhibit. It should be noted that the terminal area taxiway would need to be removed to accommodate the relocated parallel taxiway. Airfield Alternative 1 is estimated to have a total associated cost of $6.15 million. This includes $600,000 for purchase and calibration of the Runway 17 MALSR, $750,000 for relocation of the Runway 35 LDIN and localizer, $1.6 million for the runway extension, and $3.2 million for the construction of the relocated parallel taxiway. Advantages: The extension would provide a minimum of 7,000 feet operational length for landings and take-offs in both directions. OFA and RSA requirements are met on both ends of the runway. The expenses associated with displacing the threshold are avoided. The total runway extension would be 1,370 feet. Disadvantages: This alternative would be more costly than a 1,000-foot extension. AIRFIELD ALTERNATIVE 2 This alternative was also presented in the previous master plan, but was rejected because the previous FAA RSA standard necessitated displacing the Runway 17 threshold. In doing so, 6,630 feet of LDA would be available for operations to the south. The new FAA RSA design standard makes this alternative much more attractive. 4-13 The proposed 1,000-foot extension would allow the runway to provide an ASDA and LDA of 7,000 feet, as presented on Exhibit 4D. As discussed, the far end of the runway still needs to provide the full 1,000 feet of safety area. Thus, operations to the north would have available 370 feet less operational length to use. In effect, the northernmost 370 feet of runway combined with the 630 feet currently available beyond the north runway end would provide the full 1,000-foot RSA needed. The improved instrument approach for both runway ends, presented in the previous alternative, are also considered here. Runway 17 should be considered for a CAT I approach, while Runway 35 is considered for a threequarters-mile approach. Runway 17 would need a MALSR, while Runway 35 could continue to utilize the LDIN. In order to achieve CAT I approach minimums for ARC C/D-II aircraft, the parallel taxiway would need to be relocated 100 feet to the west. Airfield Alternative 2 is estimated to have a total associated cost of $5.55 million. This includes $600,000 for purchase and calibration of the Runway 17 MALSR, $750,000 for relocation of the Runway 35 LDIN and localizer, $1.2 million for the runway extension, and $3 million for the construction of the relocated parallel taxiway. Advantages: Not as expensive as Alternative 1. Provides 7,000 feet of runway length for southerly departures. Meets safety area requirements.
Page 1 and 2:
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN METRO AIRPORT
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 5 and 6:
Chapter Two AVIATION DEMAND FORECAS
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter Five AIRPORT PLANS RECOMMEN
Page 9 and 10:
Appendix A GLOSSARY OF TERMS Append
Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER ONE INVENTORY The City of M
Page 13 and 14:
04MP22-1A-2/14/05 Bowie Granbury y
Page 15 and 16:
TABLE 1B Climate Summary Mesquite,
Page 17 and 18:
04MP22-1B-2/8/06 Lead-In-Lights (LD
Page 19 and 20:
windcone. The segmented circle is l
Page 21 and 22:
A GCO is typically a necessity at a
Page 23 and 24:
04MP22-1C-2/8/06 Texas Department o
Page 25 and 26:
Fuel Facilities As the only fuel pr
Page 27 and 28:
periods of poor visibility. Mesquit
Page 29 and 30:
04MP22-1E-3/17/05 AGL FL MSL LEGEND
Page 31 and 32:
eight miles to the east is V15 and
Page 33 and 34:
channel 123.05 Mhz. Aircraft operat
Page 35 and 36:
Dallas Executive Airport, formerly
Page 37 and 38:
depicts the existing land uses in t
Page 39 and 40:
04MP22-1G-2/14/05 LEGEND Agricultur
Page 41 and 42:
EMPLOYMENT Analysis of a community
Page 43 and 44:
TABLE 1L Major Employers City of Me
Page 45 and 46:
A number of internet Web sites were
Page 47 and 48:
CHAPTER TWO Aviation demand forecas
Page 49 and 50:
population for Dallas County is for
Page 51 and 52:
to produce a market share projectio
Page 53 and 54:
In determining the aviation demand
Page 55 and 56:
04MP22-2A-2/22/05 Johnson Legend Wa
Page 57 and 58:
influence the aviation industry, le
Page 59 and 60:
The General Aviation Manufacturers
Page 61 and 62:
Registered Aircraft Forecasts One m
Page 63 and 64:
TABLE 2E County Aircraft Per 1,000
Page 65 and 66:
04MP22-2C-4/5/05 REGISTERED AIRCRAF
Page 67 and 68:
231, 243 and 258 based aircraft, wh
Page 69 and 70:
are additionally constrained from a
Page 71 and 72:
changes in a timely fashion. These
Page 73 and 74:
GENERAL AVIATION ANNUAL OPERATIONS
Page 75 and 76:
the larger business jets. As more o
Page 77 and 78:
standard of 17.5 percent of the des
Page 79 and 80:
04MP22-2E-2/8/06 BASED AIRCRAFT AIR
Page 81 and 82:
CHAPTER THREE airport FACILITY REQU
Page 83 and 84:
04MP22-3A-2/8/06 A-I B-I B-II B-I,
Page 85 and 86: the air after departure, or close t
Page 87 and 88: TABLE 3B Representative Private Jet
Page 89 and 90: TABLE 3D Minimum Itinerant Jet Oper
Page 91 and 92: Design, as a “surface surrounding
Page 93 and 94: Upgrading to ARC C/D-II presents de
Page 95 and 96: easonable capacity should start at
Page 98 and 99: aircraft-specific, such as haul len
Page 100 and 101: Haul Length The FAA Computer Progra
Page 102 and 103: ased on the criteria for runway len
Page 104 and 105: The existing critical aircraft, how
Page 106 and 107: information to allow category II an
Page 108 and 109: Airport has shown that when the ini
Page 110 and 111: Markings for a parallel runway shou
Page 112 and 113: a total of approximately 40,300 squ
Page 114 and 115: terminal building area, currently o
Page 116 and 117: TABLE 3Q Vehicle Parking Requiremen
Page 118 and 119: potential aviation demands projecte
Page 120 and 121: 04MP22-3E-4/7/05 AIRCRAFT STORAGE H
Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER FOUR ALTERNATIVES In the pr
Page 124 and 125: many corporate officials will have
Page 126 and 127: estrict northerly expansion capabil
Page 128 and 129: 04MP22-4A-7/8/05 AIRFIELD CONSIDERA
Page 130 and 131: Order states, “The goal of the Ru
Page 132 and 133: Runway Protection Zone The RPZ is a
Page 134 and 135: AIRFIELD ALTERNATIVE 1 Alternative
Page 138 and 139: Disadvantages: The runway would not
Page 140 and 141: 04MP22-4E-2/8/06 1 Mile Visibility
Page 142 and 143: ing to meet FAA and TxDOT airport d
Page 144: the TSS for Runway 17, except the o
Page 148 and 149: Since the completion of the previou
Page 150 and 151: Boulevard, Alternative 1A shows a s
Page 152 and 153: 04MP22-4J-2/8/06 1/2 Mile Visibilit
Page 154 and 155: industrial parcels become available
Page 156 and 157: • The proposed site must be large
Page 158 and 159: program was recently increased to o
Page 160 and 161: Cab Eye Elevation The minimum cab e
Page 162 and 163: Chapter Five AIRPORT PLANS
Page 164 and 165: growth over the last several years
Page 166 and 167: conducting business in the Mesquite
Page 168 and 169: The runway safety area (RSA) for AR
Page 170 and 171: at least 35 feet wide for aircraft
Page 172 and 173: 04MP22-5B-12/7/05 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Page 174 and 175: is used by the FAA and TxDOT to det
Page 182 and 183: Chapter Six FINANCIAL PLAN
Page 184 and 185: AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULES AND C
Page 186 and 187:
fueling. The fuel containment syste
Page 188 and 189:
04MP22-5A-3/21/06 2 1/2 Mile Visibi
Page 190 and 191:
INTERMEDIATE TERM IMPROVEMENTS The
Page 192 and 193:
IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY The CIP covers
Page 194 and 195:
million earmarked for Non-Primary E
Page 196 and 197:
elated grants and interest, are irr
Page 198 and 199:
development by the City. New hangar
Page 200 and 201:
hangars may be needed at the airpor
Page 202 and 203:
A Appendix GLOSSARY OF TERMS Airpor
Page 204 and 205:
a predetermined circling instrument
Page 206 and 207:
distance of an aircraft from the DM
Page 208 and 209:
2. When directed by air traffic con
Page 210 and 211:
RUNWAY BLAST PAD: a surface adjacen
Page 212 and 213:
TOUCH-AND-GO: an operation by an ai
Page 214 and 215:
ABBREVIATIONS AC: advisory circular
Page 216 and 217:
NPRM: notice of proposed rulemaking
Page 218 and 219:
Appendix B ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Page 220 and 221:
projected to account for the critic
Page 222 and 223:
TABLE A (Continued) Environmental E
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
04MP22-5A-2/8/06 65 LEGEND Airport
Page 230:
KANSAS CITY (816) 524-3500 237 N.W.
show all

airport/documents/Mesquite Master Plan Final.pdf - The City of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?