fueling. <strong>The</strong> fuel containment system for fuel trucks is a recent environmental requirement. <strong>The</strong> first project considered beyond next year’s budgeted items is the development <strong>of</strong> an <strong>airport</strong> traffic control tower (ATCT). TxDOT has an ATCT program which provides 90 percent grant funding assistance up to $1.67 million which includes the structure and equipment. Prior to the development, an ATCT siting study should be completed. <strong>The</strong> study will further define the ATCT location and costs. In addition, prior to design <strong>of</strong> an ATCT, the FAA will conduct a Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) in order to justify a tower. A tower will only be approved if the result <strong>of</strong> the BCA is greater than one (1). If the BCA is above one, then the FAA will also pay the salaries <strong>of</strong> the controllers under the contract tower program. <strong>The</strong> FAA will continue to pay for salaries, provided the BCA remains greater than one when averaged over a 15-year period. Should the BCA fall below one, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mesquite</strong> would need to share a portion <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> maintaining the tower, if the tower is to remain open. Next, the plan includes improving the existing runway safety area (RSA) to meet FAA standards. Previous analysis identified the <strong>airport</strong>’s critical aircraft as an <strong>airport</strong> reference code (ARC) C-II. <strong>The</strong> current RSA meets ARC B-II standards. Currently, surface water run-<strong>of</strong>f is channeled along an open drainage route in the ARC C-II RSA, 6-4 primarily between the runway and parallel taxiway. This project considers modifying/improving the drainage and stabilizing the RSA to meet the standard. Two landside improvements are considered in the short term. First, the plan considers the construction <strong>of</strong> a large apron in the northeastern portion <strong>of</strong> the terminal area. <strong>The</strong> apron could serve two large conventional hangars which would house an <strong>airport</strong> business, large aircraft storage, or bulk aircraft storage. <strong>The</strong> <strong>airport</strong> has been approached on numerous occasions recently for this type <strong>of</strong> development. This project would also require the strengthening and widening <strong>of</strong> an access taxiway to the new apron. <strong>The</strong> second landside project considers acquiring land to the south for additional landside development. <strong>The</strong> 50-acre parcel would <strong>of</strong>fer significant development opportunities for the future while also protecting the <strong>airport</strong> from additional incompatible land uses. It is always beneficial and suggested that the <strong>airport</strong> own land along the extended flightline. <strong>The</strong> last projects to be considered in the short term planning period are associated with the potential extension <strong>of</strong> the runway. Prior to any significant construction on an <strong>airport</strong>, an environmental assessment (EA) is required. If there are no significant environmental discoveries, then the process can proceed to design and engineering <strong>of</strong> the runway extension.
04MP22-6A-3/22/06 SHORT TERM PROGRAM (0-5 YEARS) 1 Purchase 18 Unit T-Hangar with <strong>of</strong>fice space 2 Contsruct (2) T-Hangar Buildings (18 units) 3 Fuel Containment for Mobile Refuellers 4 Airport Entrance Sign 5 Construct Airport Traffic Control Tower 6 Improve Runway Safety Area for ARC C/D-II 7 Contstruct Apron for Hangar Development (9,450 sq yds) 8 Acquire 50 Acres <strong>of</strong> Land for Landside Development 9 Install Medium IntensityTaxiway Lights 10 Upgrade Runway Lights 11 Environmental assessment for runway extension 12 Acquire Land For Runway Extension 13 Relocate Localizer and Lead-In Lights 14 Extend Runway and Parallel Taxiway 1,370' South 15 Miscellaneous RAMP Projects SHORT TERM PROGRAM (0-5 YEARS) INTERMEDIATE TERM PROGRAM (6-10 YEARS) 1 Expand Terminal Apron South - Phase I 2 Construct Taxiway/Taxilanes for T-Hangar Construction 3 Construct 20 T-Hangar Units 4 Rehabilitate Landside Pavements 5 Miscellaneous RAMP Projects INTERMEDIATE TERM PROGRAM (6-10 YEARS) LONG TERM PROGRAM (11-20 YEARS) 1 Relocate Parallel Taxiway to 400 ' from Runway 2 Upgrade Runway 17 Approach (MALSR, Land Purchase) 3 Expand Terminal Apron South - Phase II 4 Extend Airport Road South & Construct Parking Lots 5 Improved Drainage for South Landside Development 6 Extend Utilities for South Landside Development 7 Construct Apron for Corporate Hangar Development 8 Construct Taxiwlanes for T-Hangar Development 9 Construct 20 T-hangar Units 10 Construct Temporary Eastside Parallel Taxiway* 11 Reconstruct Runway 17-35 (Existing 6,000') 12 Acquire 98 Acres <strong>of</strong> Land West <strong>of</strong> Airport Road 13 Miscellaneous RAMP Projects LONG TERM PROGRAM (10-20 YEARS) TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS * FAA discressionary funds Project Cost $430,000 800,000 100,000 30,000 1,666,667 600,000 921,400 1,437,500 150,000 150,000 200,000 414,000 750,000 3,388,000 300,000 $11,337,567 $2,166,700 1,083,300 600,000 780,000 300,000 $4,930,000 $3,855,000 1,190,000 3,791,700 780,000 1,140,000 500,000 1,516,700 1,200,000 900,000 4,062,500 7,000,000 1,656,000 600,000 $28,191,900 $44,459,467 TxDOT Share $0 0 0 0 1,500,000 540,000 829,260 1,293,750 135,000 135,000 180,000 372,600 675,000 3,049,200 150,000 $8,859,810 $1,950,030 974,970 0 702,000 150,000 $3,777,000 $3,469,500$ 1,071,000 3,412,530 390,000 0 0 1,365,030 1,080,000 0 3,656,250 6,300,000 1,490,400 300,000 $22,534,710 $35,171,520 Local Share $430,000 800,000 100,000 30,000 166,667 60,000 92,140 143,750 15,000 15,000 20,000 41,400 75,000 338,000 150,000 $2,476,957 216,670 108,330 600,000 78,000 150,000 $1,153,000 385,500 119,000 379,170 390,000 1,140,000 500,000 151,670 120,000 900,000 406,250 700,000 165,600 300,000 $5,657,190 $9,287,147 Exhibit 6A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
- Page 1 and 2:
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN METRO AIRPORT
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Page 5 and 6:
Chapter Two AVIATION DEMAND FORECAS
- Page 7 and 8:
Chapter Five AIRPORT PLANS RECOMMEN
- Page 9 and 10:
Appendix A GLOSSARY OF TERMS Append
- Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER ONE INVENTORY The City of M
- Page 13 and 14:
04MP22-1A-2/14/05 Bowie Granbury y
- Page 15 and 16:
TABLE 1B Climate Summary Mesquite,
- Page 17 and 18:
04MP22-1B-2/8/06 Lead-In-Lights (LD
- Page 19 and 20:
windcone. The segmented circle is l
- Page 21 and 22:
A GCO is typically a necessity at a
- Page 23 and 24:
04MP22-1C-2/8/06 Texas Department o
- Page 25 and 26:
Fuel Facilities As the only fuel pr
- Page 27 and 28:
periods of poor visibility. Mesquit
- Page 29 and 30:
04MP22-1E-3/17/05 AGL FL MSL LEGEND
- Page 31 and 32:
eight miles to the east is V15 and
- Page 33 and 34:
channel 123.05 Mhz. Aircraft operat
- Page 35 and 36:
Dallas Executive Airport, formerly
- Page 37 and 38:
depicts the existing land uses in t
- Page 39 and 40:
04MP22-1G-2/14/05 LEGEND Agricultur
- Page 41 and 42:
EMPLOYMENT Analysis of a community
- Page 43 and 44:
TABLE 1L Major Employers City of Me
- Page 45 and 46:
A number of internet Web sites were
- Page 47 and 48:
CHAPTER TWO Aviation demand forecas
- Page 49 and 50:
population for Dallas County is for
- Page 51 and 52:
to produce a market share projectio
- Page 53 and 54:
In determining the aviation demand
- Page 55 and 56:
04MP22-2A-2/22/05 Johnson Legend Wa
- Page 57 and 58:
influence the aviation industry, le
- Page 59 and 60:
The General Aviation Manufacturers
- Page 61 and 62:
Registered Aircraft Forecasts One m
- Page 63 and 64:
TABLE 2E County Aircraft Per 1,000
- Page 65 and 66:
04MP22-2C-4/5/05 REGISTERED AIRCRAF
- Page 67 and 68:
231, 243 and 258 based aircraft, wh
- Page 69 and 70:
are additionally constrained from a
- Page 71 and 72:
changes in a timely fashion. These
- Page 73 and 74:
GENERAL AVIATION ANNUAL OPERATIONS
- Page 75 and 76:
the larger business jets. As more o
- Page 77 and 78:
standard of 17.5 percent of the des
- Page 79 and 80:
04MP22-2E-2/8/06 BASED AIRCRAFT AIR
- Page 81 and 82:
CHAPTER THREE airport FACILITY REQU
- Page 83 and 84:
04MP22-3A-2/8/06 A-I B-I B-II B-I,
- Page 85 and 86:
the air after departure, or close t
- Page 87 and 88:
TABLE 3B Representative Private Jet
- Page 89 and 90:
TABLE 3D Minimum Itinerant Jet Oper
- Page 91 and 92:
Design, as a “surface surrounding
- Page 93 and 94:
Upgrading to ARC C/D-II presents de
- Page 95 and 96:
easonable capacity should start at
- Page 98 and 99:
aircraft-specific, such as haul len
- Page 100 and 101:
Haul Length The FAA Computer Progra
- Page 102 and 103:
ased on the criteria for runway len
- Page 104 and 105:
The existing critical aircraft, how
- Page 106 and 107:
information to allow category II an
- Page 108 and 109:
Airport has shown that when the ini
- Page 110 and 111:
Markings for a parallel runway shou
- Page 112 and 113:
a total of approximately 40,300 squ
- Page 114 and 115:
terminal building area, currently o
- Page 116 and 117:
TABLE 3Q Vehicle Parking Requiremen
- Page 118 and 119:
potential aviation demands projecte
- Page 120 and 121:
04MP22-3E-4/7/05 AIRCRAFT STORAGE H
- Page 122 and 123:
CHAPTER FOUR ALTERNATIVES In the pr
- Page 124 and 125:
many corporate officials will have
- Page 126 and 127:
estrict northerly expansion capabil
- Page 128 and 129:
04MP22-4A-7/8/05 AIRFIELD CONSIDERA
- Page 130 and 131:
Order states, “The goal of the Ru
- Page 132 and 133:
Runway Protection Zone The RPZ is a
- Page 134 and 135:
AIRFIELD ALTERNATIVE 1 Alternative
- Page 136 and 137: 04MP22-4C-6/17/05 MALSR DECLARED DI
- Page 138 and 139: Disadvantages: The runway would not
- Page 140 and 141: 04MP22-4E-2/8/06 1 Mile Visibility
- Page 142 and 143: ing to meet FAA and TxDOT airport d
- Page 144: the TSS for Runway 17, except the o
- Page 148 and 149: Since the completion of the previou
- Page 150 and 151: Boulevard, Alternative 1A shows a s
- Page 152 and 153: 04MP22-4J-2/8/06 1/2 Mile Visibilit
- Page 154 and 155: industrial parcels become available
- Page 156 and 157: • The proposed site must be large
- Page 158 and 159: program was recently increased to o
- Page 160 and 161: Cab Eye Elevation The minimum cab e
- Page 162 and 163: Chapter Five AIRPORT PLANS
- Page 164 and 165: growth over the last several years
- Page 166 and 167: conducting business in the Mesquite
- Page 168 and 169: The runway safety area (RSA) for AR
- Page 170 and 171: at least 35 feet wide for aircraft
- Page 172 and 173: 04MP22-5B-12/7/05 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Page 174 and 175: is used by the FAA and TxDOT to det
- Page 182 and 183: Chapter Six FINANCIAL PLAN
- Page 184 and 185: AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULES AND C
- Page 188 and 189: 04MP22-5A-3/21/06 2 1/2 Mile Visibi
- Page 190 and 191: INTERMEDIATE TERM IMPROVEMENTS The
- Page 192 and 193: IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY The CIP covers
- Page 194 and 195: million earmarked for Non-Primary E
- Page 196 and 197: elated grants and interest, are irr
- Page 198 and 199: development by the City. New hangar
- Page 200 and 201: hangars may be needed at the airpor
- Page 202 and 203: A Appendix GLOSSARY OF TERMS Airpor
- Page 204 and 205: a predetermined circling instrument
- Page 206 and 207: distance of an aircraft from the DM
- Page 208 and 209: 2. When directed by air traffic con
- Page 210 and 211: RUNWAY BLAST PAD: a surface adjacen
- Page 212 and 213: TOUCH-AND-GO: an operation by an ai
- Page 214 and 215: ABBREVIATIONS AC: advisory circular
- Page 216 and 217: NPRM: notice of proposed rulemaking
- Page 218 and 219: Appendix B ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
- Page 220 and 221: projected to account for the critic
- Page 222 and 223: TABLE A (Continued) Environmental E
- Page 224 and 225: TABLE A (Continued) Environmental E
- Page 226 and 227: TABLE A (Continued) Environmental E
- Page 228 and 229: 04MP22-5A-2/8/06 65 LEGEND Airport
- Page 230: KANSAS CITY (816) 524-3500 237 N.W.