23.12.2012 Views

airport/documents/Mesquite Master Plan Final.pdf - The City of ...

airport/documents/Mesquite Master Plan Final.pdf - The City of ...

airport/documents/Mesquite Master Plan Final.pdf - The City of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Disadvantages: <strong>The</strong> runway would not<br />

provide 7,000 feet for northerly take-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

and landings; instead, 6,630 feet would<br />

be declared.<br />

PARALLEL RUNWAY<br />

ALTERNATIVES<br />

Annual operation projections, conducted<br />

in Chapter Two - Aviation Forecasts,<br />

indicated that the <strong>airport</strong> could<br />

experience 166,500 annual aircraft<br />

operations by the long term planning<br />

horizon. Once annual operations reach<br />

60 percent <strong>of</strong> the airfield’s annual<br />

service volume (ASV), consideration<br />

should be given to capacity<br />

enhancement solutions. <strong>The</strong> current<br />

ASV <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mesquite</strong> Metro Airport is<br />

estimated at 210,000 annual operations;<br />

thus, the projected long term operations<br />

would reach approximately 80 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the airfield’s ASV. By the<br />

intermediate planning horizon, annual<br />

operations are projected to be 67<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> ASV.<br />

Analysis in Chapter Three - Facility<br />

Requirements presented an option <strong>of</strong><br />

constructing a parallel runway designed<br />

to accommodate smaller aircraft the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> the time, which would<br />

increase the total ASV to approximately<br />

340,000. It would also be prudent for<br />

this runway to be designed to<br />

accommodate most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>airport</strong><br />

activity for periods when the existing<br />

runway is closed. When single-runway<br />

<strong>airport</strong>s close for lengthy periods <strong>of</strong> time<br />

(up to one year for a runway<br />

reconstruct), the negative economic<br />

impacts can be severe. As a result, the<br />

parallel runway is recommended to be<br />

4-14<br />

considered at 5,000 feet in length so<br />

that all smaller aircraft and many<br />

business jet aircraft can still operate at<br />

the <strong>airport</strong>. Exhibit 4E depicts two<br />

parallel runway alternatives, one to the<br />

east and the other to the west <strong>of</strong> the<br />

existing runway.<br />

Parallel Runway Alternative A<br />

This alternative considers locating the<br />

parallel runway to the west <strong>of</strong> Airport<br />

Blvd. <strong>The</strong> proposed runway is designed<br />

to be 5,000 feet long and 75 feet wide.<br />

<strong>The</strong> safety areas are planned to meet<br />

ARC B-II standards and the approaches<br />

are considered to have visibility<br />

minimums <strong>of</strong> one mile. <strong>The</strong> runway is<br />

situated so that RPZs will not<br />

encompass any populated areas. Only<br />

a small portion <strong>of</strong> the south RPZ would<br />

cross Berry Road, over a wooded area.<br />

This portion <strong>of</strong> land would be<br />

recommended to be purchased in fee<br />

simple to prevent land uses<br />

incompatible with the RPZ.<br />

Approximately 153 acres, primarily<br />

farmland (currently zoned industrial),<br />

would need to be acquired in order to<br />

implement this option. Also included in<br />

this tract is one homestead to the north<br />

<strong>of</strong> the proposed runway. It is estimated<br />

that land to be acquired would cost<br />

approximately $4.6 million. This option<br />

would also require significant<br />

earthwork and fill, in order to provide a<br />

relatively flat area for the southern<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the runway. Site preparation<br />

alone is estimated at $900,000, and the<br />

runway/taxiway would cost<br />

approximately $6.2 million, for a total<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> $11.7 million.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!