25.12.2012 Views

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Many of these ships are now 15 to 20 years old ard it is generally<br />

bdievedthatmnyof thmwillbe scrappedduringthenextfewyears,<br />

beauseitwillbeuneconamicto bringthemuptothestmdardsrequired<br />

by the 1992 ame&ments. They will then be replaced by new ships which<br />

will ccmply fully with all MARPOL 73/78 requirements.<br />

This will almost certainly be beneficial to the marine<br />

environment. New ships tend to be safer +& older ones simply because<br />

they are not so prone to break dam. ?he new ships will also be built to<br />

hiqh~Standam% in preventing both operational and accidental pollution:<br />

my VUXs operating tcday are not fitted with seqreqated ballast tanks<br />

or crude oil washing - their replacmenxs will be.<br />

Tt is also hoped that durixq the next few years international<br />

shipping conventions - including ImL 73/78 - will be much more<br />

effectively implemented than in the past. other mmsures developed by<br />

IMO are intended to achieve this, for example, by -ising the<br />

r~nsibilities of m,-ement and also mnitoring the record of<br />

kxdividual Goverrments in putting the convention into effect. Themore<br />

effective implmentation of port State control maasures is also bei_r~~<br />

encouraged.<br />

The provision of adequate reception facilities for wastes is<br />

crucial to the successful implmentation of MAReoL 73/78. They are<br />

required by four of the five annexes (Annex III is the exception) and the<br />

intention is that ships will be able to retain their wastes on board<br />

until theyreachpon.<br />

Although fat ilities are mandatory, in practice they are often<br />

inadequate and in some cases still non-existent. In some countries<br />

facilities have been provided, but the charge for using thm is so<br />

excessive that many ships avoid them.<br />

Many countries whit!! have larqe oil exports have so far failed to<br />

ratify MAREQL 73178. Onereason is that they would be obliged to provide<br />

reception facilities for oily wastes. The costs of doing so could be<br />

very great, since most tank cleaning operations take place during the<br />

ballast stage of the tanker's voyaqe: the reception facilities required<br />

at an oil loadinq pox, therefore, aremuchqreaterthan those need&<br />

elsewhere.<br />

All of this mkes life very difficult for the mers and crew of<br />

theshipconcerned. MARFOLqreatlylimits the discharqeofwastes into<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!