25.12.2012 Views

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the type and volume of wastes received. This type of<br />

information is necessary for determining the effort expended<br />

on enforcement.<br />

A single small reception facility receiving only Annex V<br />

wastes will not require the same enforcement effort as a<br />

number of reception facilities operating in several ports and<br />

receiving all types of wastes and transporting the wastes to<br />

several treatment plants.<br />

The legislation should include the power for the inspector to<br />

enter and inspect all aspects of the facility without prior<br />

notice. However, to protect the operators of the facility, the<br />

legislation should also include the requirements for search<br />

warrants to collect and seize evidence. The regulatory agency<br />

should prepare yearly inspection schedules which identify the<br />

frequency of inspection but not necessarily the dates for<br />

inspection during the upcoming year.<br />

Probably the most important aspect of any compliance and<br />

enforcement program is a clear policy statement on how the<br />

legislation will be enforced. Many countries have such<br />

policies and they are available on request. The policy should<br />

describe how to handle minor offenses. If all offenses are<br />

taken to the judicial system, it will require a significant<br />

effort and time will be wasted. The primary purpose of<br />

enforcement is to achieve compliance and this objective may be<br />

best achieved when the judicial system is reserved for major<br />

violations or repeated offenses.<br />

Consideration should be given to a system of warnings prior to<br />

taking court action for offenses of a minor nature. The<br />

environmental consequences of the offence should dictate the<br />

action taken. For example, delay of a day or two in reporting<br />

according to the conditions of a permit may be a minor offence<br />

and the regulatory authority could issue a verbal or written<br />

warning to the offender. However, discharge of untreated<br />

effluent from a treatment plant may result in significant<br />

environmental harm and a decision to take judicial action<br />

immediately would be justified.<br />

Ticketing provisions, similar to parking tickets, could also<br />

be considered in the legislation and thus the inspector could<br />

issue a ticket for minor violations.<br />

Each country should select an approach to enforcement and<br />

compliance that suits the country's needs and is consistent<br />

with national legislation. The approaches suggested here<br />

include warnings and a system of fines to encourage illegal<br />

activities. The fines should be large enough to be a deterrent<br />

but allow flexibility where accidents even though no fault of<br />

the owner or operator of the facility.<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!