25.12.2012 Views

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(9<br />

(9)<br />

0-O<br />

0)<br />

5<br />

5.1<br />

Pre-spill preventive measures<br />

The expenses incurred for preventive measures are recoverable under the 1992<br />

Conventions even when there was no spill of oil as a result of the incident, provided<br />

that there was a grave and imminent danger of pollution damage.<br />

Definition of “pollution damage”<br />

The 1992 Protocol to the Civil Liability Convention contains a new definition of the<br />

notion of pollution damage which retains the basic wording of the existing definition<br />

but a phrase has been added which clarifies whether and to what extent damage to<br />

the environment is covered by the definition. It is provided that compensation for<br />

impairment of the environment (other than loss of profit from such impairment) shall<br />

be limited to costs of reasonable measures of reinstatement actually undertaken or<br />

to be undertaken.<br />

Capping Provision<br />

The Conference decided to include in the 1992 Protocol to the Fund Convention<br />

provisions setting a cap on contributions to the IOPC Fund payable by oil receivers<br />

in any given State. This cap was set at 27.5% of the total contributions to the IOPC<br />

Fund. The capping system will cease to apply when the total quantity of<br />

contributing oil received during a calendar year in all Member States of the new<br />

Fund set up under the 1992 Protocol exceeds 750 million tonnes, or after five years<br />

from the entry into force of the 1992 Protocol to the Fund Convention, whichever is<br />

the earlier.<br />

Entry into force<br />

The 1992 Protocol to the Civil Liability Convention will come into force when ratified<br />

by ten States, including four States each with not less than one million units of<br />

gross tanker tonnage. The 1992 Protocol to the Fund Convention will enter into<br />

force when ratified by at least eight States and when the total quantity of<br />

contributing oil received during a given calendar year in all the ratifying States is at<br />

least 450 million tonnes.<br />

CLAIMS AGAINST THE IOPC FUND<br />

Claims experience<br />

From its establishment in February 1979 to 1 June 1993, the IOPC Fund has been involved in the<br />

settlement of claims arising out of 66 incidents. 34 of these incidents have occurred in Japan. 22<br />

incidents, leading in general to much larger claims, took place in European waters, one incident in<br />

Algeria, four in Canada, one in Indonesia. two in the Persian Gulf. one in the Caribbean and one in<br />

the Republic of Korea. Some of these incidents were settled, however, without any payment being<br />

made by the IOPC Fund. The IOPC Fund has paid compensation or indemnification amounting to<br />

about US $92 million in relation to the 56 incidents which have been entirely or partially settled.<br />

The case involving the largest payment was the TAN10 incident (France, 1980). where the IOPC<br />

Fund paid FFr222 million (UW40.6 million) to claimants. In the HAVEN incident, the aggregate<br />

amount of the claims greatly exceeds the maximum amount payable under the Civil Liability<br />

Convention and the Fund Convention, but so far no payments have been made.<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!