25.12.2012 Views

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

BALTIC SEAENVIRONMENT PROCEEDINGS No. 59 - Helcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

type of processes, discharges of different substances etc. has been collected<br />

by the questionnaires. A draft recommendation is prepared containing<br />

average target figures which offers easier acceptance of the Contracting<br />

Parties. On the other hand the Lead Country or a country with good experi-<br />

ence in the branch concerned can prepare a draft recommendation based on<br />

the existing information and nowadays on best available technology. This<br />

procedure saves time but may easier create problems with rapid adoption and<br />

with implementation.<br />

The basic criteria for a draft recommendation is that every Contracting Party<br />

can adopt it and, what is most important, can implement it within the settled<br />

timeschedule. In the 1980’s the target figures were quite easily reached by<br />

the Federal Republic of Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Finland. At the<br />

same time other Contracting Parties had difficulties with the implementation.<br />

In the 1990’s the target values and deadlines for implementation demands<br />

special national measures for every Contracting Party.<br />

When adopting HELCOM recommendations the Contracting Parties primar-<br />

ily want to reduce the pollution load but sometimes recommendations are<br />

also supporting and activating national environmental protection policy.<br />

The main idea of the recommendations has been to set the same target<br />

figures and timeschedule for each Contracting Party. Due to the changes in<br />

Central and Eastern Europe during the last 3-4 years with the new countries<br />

in transition becoming Contracting Parties of the Helsinki Convention, the<br />

3rd meeting of the Technological Committee in 1992 was ready first time to<br />

propose to the Commission for adoption a recommendation with three years<br />

longer time of implementation for countries in transition (Draft HELCOM<br />

Recommendation concerning restriction of discharges from the production of<br />

wood-containing and woodfree paper and paperboard). The obstacle to final<br />

adoption were the different opinion as to the area of implementation.<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!