30.12.2012 Views

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Time in the Formulation of Scientific Theory 131<br />

comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent<br />

and powerful Being.” 61 This being is God in the sense that it rules over<br />

everything. The word “God” is understood relationally, 62 as Lord over servants:<br />

“It is the dominion of a spiritual being which constitutes a God.” 63<br />

God’s duration lasts from eternity to eternity and God’s presence from<br />

infinity to infinity; however, “he is not duration or space, but he endures<br />

and is present.l.l.l. [H]e constitutes duration and space.” 64 God is omnipresent,<br />

not only virtually, but also substantially. 65 God necessarily exists<br />

forever and everywhere. All bodies move in God without suffering resistance<br />

from the divine omnipresence. 66 From a human perspective, three attributes<br />

should be given to God, namely, “dominion, providence, and final<br />

causes.” 67 Should God also therefore be identified as the cause of the gravity<br />

that determines the phenomena of heaven and earth? Newton expresses<br />

himself cautiously on this matter. Up to this point, he says that he has not<br />

been able to derive the causes of the properties of gravity empirically, and he<br />

rejects hypotheses. Here, one finds the sentence that is often cited out of<br />

context: “Hypotheses non fingo.” (I do not manufacture hypotheses). 68<br />

Newton had already expressed the same thoughts towards the end of<br />

Query 28 in Opticks, where he described the main task of natural philosophy<br />

as being “to argue from Phenomena without feigning Hypotheses, and<br />

to deduce Causes from Effects, till we come to the very first Cause, which<br />

certainly is not mechanical .l.l.” 69 Even if natural philosophy does not provide<br />

direct access to this first cause, it does lead to close proximity and is<br />

therefore quite valuable. The consideration of natural phenomena suggests<br />

that there is a Being incorporeal, living, intelligent, omnipresent, who in infinite<br />

Space, as it were in his Sensory, sees the things themselves intimately, and throughly<br />

[sic] perceives them, and comprehends them wholly by their immediate Presence<br />

to himself: Of which things the Images only carried through the Organs of Sense<br />

into our little Sensoriums, are there seen and beheld by that which in us perceives<br />

and thinks. 70<br />

There is a similar reflection at the end of Query 31. In a clear allusion to<br />

the biblical story of creation, Newton considers it to be probable that God<br />

“in the beginning form’d Matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable<br />

Particles, .l.l. no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself<br />

made one in the first Creation.” 71 These particles can indeed be combined<br />

into new shapes, but their stability is the basis for all continuity of natural<br />

phenomena. The particles are controlled by forces of natural laws, thanks to<br />

which the world is able to maintain itself, with the exception of a few irregularities<br />

that can increase “till this system wants a reformation.” 72 God can

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!