30.12.2012 Views

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Time in the Formulation of Scientific Theory 161<br />

The boundary of a black hole is characterized as an absolute event horizon<br />

or Schwarzschild radius. It is assumed that in the center of a black hole,<br />

the curvature of space-time becomes infinite, i.e., that space and time come<br />

“to an end.” This end must remain hidden to every external observer, however,<br />

because the “naked” singularity always lies on the other side of the<br />

event horizon, over which no light can penetrate to the outside. A black<br />

hole can be observed only indirectly, namely, by means of the gravitational<br />

force of attraction that it exerts on its environment. A person approaching a<br />

Schwarzschild radius would instantly fall into the black hole (according to<br />

the person’s reference system), but an observer on earth would see the same<br />

person for an infinite period of time just in front of the Schwarzschild radius;<br />

from her perspective, the person would never cross this boundary. If<br />

time dilatation becomes infinite, as it does on the event horizon of a black<br />

hole, then a microsecond for one is infinite time for another. 261<br />

According to the time symmetry of the theory of relativity, there must<br />

also be a phenomenon that demonstrates a directly opposite behavior of<br />

time, i.e., infinitely dense matter in a singularity that explodes into a cascade<br />

of light. In physics, however, such “white holes” are generally thought<br />

to be improbable. Due to their untenable physical consequences, Roger<br />

Penrose simply excluded them by using a hypothesis called “cosmic censorship.”<br />

Something similar also applies to so-called time travel into the past;<br />

physical laws, at least according to Hawking, appear to favor a cosmic<br />

“Chronology Protection Agency,” 262 which does not permit such things to<br />

happen. 263<br />

One should distinguish between the “end” of time in the singularity of a<br />

black hole and a possible end singularity of the entire universe. Currently,<br />

nothing definitive can be said about the latter, for what one can expect for<br />

the distant future of our expanding universe is critically dependent upon<br />

the mean density of matter. Up until now, however, the density of the universe<br />

has not been determined in any precise way.<br />

If the density is so low that gravity cannot curb the expansion, then the<br />

universe will continue to expand. In this case, we are living in an open universe<br />

that is becoming infinitely larger and larger. If enough mass exists,<br />

however, so that its gravitation stops the expansion and ultimately causes<br />

the universe to collapse, then we live in a closed, finite universe.<br />

The third possibility has a special appeal: The mass density of the universe<br />

could possess precisely that critical level above which it would collapse<br />

and below which it would expand forever. In this case, the expansion velocity<br />

of the universe would become slower and slower without ever reaching<br />

the zero point. In this case, we would also live in an open universe. This<br />

third model is called the Einstein–de Sitter universe.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!