30.12.2012 Views

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Time in the Formulation of Scientific Theory 173<br />

time changes its status within the formulation of physical theory. Whereas<br />

in Newton and Leibniz, time is a necessary explanatory component without<br />

a substantial role, in Prigogine and Cramer, it comes close to being an operational<br />

entity. Theoreticians such as J. Barbour, on the contrary, do not<br />

think that time exists.<br />

In Newton, space and time are the permanent stage for the cosmic drama.<br />

Visible to everyone and in absolute symmetry, every plank is arranged<br />

precisely and every position of the actors can be determined objectively. Although<br />

it is the scene for the most diverse plays, the stage remains basically<br />

untouched by what happens on it. Its solidity is unquestionable; God is its<br />

guarantor. Thus the task of the physicist is merely to explain the action of<br />

the drama. This point of view dominated two and a half centuries with singular<br />

majesty—and for good reason: Its practical applicability in the sphere<br />

of daily life gave it an indestructible vitality. Its defects became obvious only<br />

when physicists began to deal with the very small, the very large, and the<br />

very fast.<br />

Thus the theories of relativity showed that the difference between the<br />

stage and the play is an artificial one. Space and time are just as much a part<br />

of the drama as are the actors, who are somewhat comparable to the atoms<br />

of matter. Scientific research can therefore not limit itself to the behavior of<br />

atoms, i.e., to the performing of the actors. It must be able to describe the<br />

actors, the drama, the stage, and the audience, as well as their interaction. 314<br />

The special theory of relativity robbed the concept of a universally valid<br />

“now” of its validity. It replaced the one absolute time with particular times<br />

dependent on motion [Eigenzeiten], which can be determined precisely and<br />

compared to one another. In the theory of relativity, the issue is less one of<br />

relativization than it is one of relation. Not only do the different particular<br />

times [Eigenzeiten] relate to one another, but space and time also establish a<br />

close connection. Time lost even more sovereignty as a result of the general<br />

theory of relativity. In this theory, Einstein succeeded in linking time, space,<br />

matter, and energy, including gravity. The absolute, true, and mathematical<br />

time reappeared as curved space-time.<br />

Quantum physics was even more iconoclastic with regard to the absoluteness<br />

of time because it caused its ability to be measured to disappear<br />

in the fog of the uncertainty relation. It touched the boundaries of logic and<br />

language and essentially called into question the meaning of the concepts<br />

“objective” and “subjective.” Mathematical undecidability and nonlocality<br />

in the quantum regime attest to the fact that we can never have complete<br />

information and thus can never have complete control over the reality in<br />

which we participate unless there are hidden parameters, yet to be discovered,<br />

that once again ensure, on a deeper level, a complete determinacy of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!