30.12.2012 Views

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

Time&Eternity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 chapter 2<br />

Christ. 151 This seeming contradiction can be explained by the fact that Paul<br />

neither speaks antithetically of time and eternity nor permits eternity to appear<br />

as endless time. The breaking through of the new into the old, which is<br />

thematized as the tension between the “already” and the “not-yet,” interests<br />

him more than the abstract forms of time and eternity.<br />

In the later writings of the New Testament, we can see attempts to link<br />

eschatology, apocalypticism, and Christology to one another. With increasing<br />

temporal distance to Jesus’ life on earth, thoughts about the events that<br />

are expected at the end of time are turned into a doctrine of the “Last<br />

Things,” which moves to the margin of ecclesiastical instruction. 152 Colossians<br />

and Ephesians replace eschatological expectation with spatial concepts<br />

and, in contrast to Romans, allow the resurrection with Christ to take place<br />

in Baptism. 153 End-time expectation is less oriented toward the resurrection<br />

of the dead than toward the revelation of the doxa. Until then, the extended<br />

time of waiting is used for exhortation. The most obvious connection of eschatology,<br />

apocalypticism, and Christology can be encountered in the Revelation<br />

of John: “The wealth of apocalyptic images is embraced by the<br />

Christological confession. Thus, the apocalyptic material has experienced a<br />

link to history that alters its character in a basic way, so that it now serves to<br />

illustrate the universality of the Christ event.” 154<br />

Spatial and temporal conceptions in eschatological thought cannot simply<br />

be isolated from each other. Rather, a combination of the two ways of<br />

thinking should be assumed, although in apocalypticism the spatial components<br />

are more salient.<br />

Summarizing Theses<br />

1. The concept of time is not a specific concern in the Bible. In the Old<br />

Testament, as in the New Testament, one does not deal with notions of the<br />

essence of time and/or eternity per se.<br />

2. A dualism of time and eternity cannot be discovered in the Bible.<br />

Time and eternity do not encounter each other as an antithesis, but rather<br />

relate to each other in various ways.<br />

3. There is general agreement in biblical research that the Bible deals<br />

more with the content than with the form of time. Time is not an empty<br />

category; instead, time is filled time. It is granted by God, and it is oriented<br />

toward a goal. Correspondingly, eternity is also not encountered as an endlessly<br />

extended form of time, but rather as something qualitatively different<br />

from time.<br />

4. Contrasting cyclical and linear time proves to be inadequate. Generally<br />

speaking, the inadequacy and provisional nature of spatial expressions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!