17.01.2013 Views

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the psycho-sociology of environment, a key concept in the relationship between people and their<br />

environment is appropriation. Appropriation is a process by which people exert their influence on the<br />

physical environment (Fischer 1997; Moles and Rohmer, 1998). Through appropriation people create<br />

space‘s experience and build attachement to a place (Bones et Secchiaroli, 1995; Moles et Rohmer, 1982;<br />

De Certeau, 1980; Fischer, 1981).<br />

Every physical act is an appropriation practice (Moles et Rohmer, 1977), but two elementary<br />

aspects have been distinguished (Fischer, 1981): visual activity (minimal means of<br />

appropriation) and exploration (based on movement and contact).<br />

These appropriation practices, once combined, constitute appropriation strategies. These are ways of<br />

exploring the physical environment and are formal structures limited in number. Each has an underlying<br />

signification, referring to the “lived” experience in space.<br />

Moles and Rohmer (1977), like Titus and Everett (1995), have proposed the existence of two main<br />

strategies: one functional (epistemic) and one ludic (hedonic). But they proposed to split hedonic<br />

strategies into active and passive strategies. These differ from each other by the level of involvement of<br />

the person. Active strategies require high involvement (touching a product) whereas passive strategies<br />

require lower involvement (just looking at the product).<br />

The two empirical investigations on the topic have been carried out in a museum and in a<br />

subway (see Tables 1,2 and 3). These studies have not revealed three strategies but four: the first<br />

three mentioned above, and another one understood as a denial of the environment and elements<br />

in it.<br />

Author Space studied Appropriation practices observed<br />

Véron and Cultural Walking: point of entrance, space between people and exhibit panels, order of the visit, stoppings<br />

Levasseur<br />

(1991)<br />

exhibition<br />

Floch (1990) Parisian Actions: absorbed in a book, seating, head lowered; walks straight to a point on the platform (connection);<br />

subway stops to an exhibition (guitarist); follows the flow, adopt the rhythm of the flow; sits up to look at the<br />

landscape; listen to the music (walkman), looking nowhere; listens to a conversation; zigzags; does not<br />

give a helpful hand to a person with heavy luggage at a ticket barrier; is not (like other people) affected by<br />

repeated billboards; looks at people getting in; speeds up to avoid getting blocked by opposite flows<br />

Table 1. Appropriation practices in two non-retail spaces<br />

Véron and<br />

Levasseur<br />

Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4<br />

Fish<br />

Walks in the middle of the<br />

Butterfly<br />

zigzags, left-right-left–<br />

148<br />

Ant<br />

When he stops, he is close to<br />

Grasshopper<br />

Jumps from one point to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!