17.01.2013 Views

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

examine the dimensionality of these constructs, principal components analysis with varimax<br />

rotation was undertaken for each group separately. For in-store shoppers, five components with<br />

eigen<strong>value</strong>s greater than one were extracted from the data. Together, these five components explain<br />

77.9% of the total variance. For online shoppers, four components with eigen<strong>value</strong>s greater than<br />

one were extracted; together, they explain 84.4% of the total variance. Thus, there is strong<br />

evidence in support of Hypothesis 1; the dimensionality of retail convenience is different for the<br />

two different types of shopping formats. Evidence of discriminant validity is provided by the fact<br />

that these items did not want to load on other components with which they were not supposed to be<br />

associated. Further, evidence of convergent validity is provided by the high loadings of each item<br />

on their respective component.<br />

A more rigorous examination of the validity of these scales was conducted with<br />

confirmatory factor analysis using LISREL 8.3 for Windows. As can be seen in Tables 3 and 4, the<br />

statistically significant λ x parameter estimates provide evidence of convergent validity.<br />

Additionally, the majority of the squared multiple correlations (SMCs), defined as the percentage of<br />

variance in each item that is explained by the latent construct of interest, are above 50%, indicating<br />

that each item performed well in capturing its construct of interest.<br />

Modification indices associated with λ x and Θ δ reveal some problems with discriminant<br />

validity. Specifically, there were seven modification indices in the λ x matrix for in-store shoppers,<br />

indicating that items search2, help3, possess1, and possess2 wanted to be associated with other<br />

dimensions of convenience. Additionally, there were 13 modification indices in Θ δ that indicate<br />

some error terms wanted to correlate. These changes were not incorporated in the model, as<br />

theoretically it does not make sense to do so. These problematic modification indices explain the<br />

poor overall fit: chi-square=498.08, 198 df, p=0.00; RMSEA=0.08; RMR=0.06; GFI=0.85.<br />

Problematic modification indices also surfaced in the measurement model for online<br />

shoppers. Three items (access2, possess2, and possess4) wanted to be associated with other<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!