17.01.2013 Views

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2. Perceived Difficulty of Evaluation<br />

Intangibility makes it harder for marketers to promote intangible products/services and for<br />

consumers to evaluate offerings with intangible attributes (Zeithaml 1981). Much of the<br />

literature in services marketing has linked intangibility to consumers’ decision-making<br />

difficulties including decreased certainty of evaluation (Mitchell and Greatorex 1993; Murray<br />

1991) and increased difficulty of evaluation (McDougall 1987; McDougall and Snetsinger 1990;<br />

Zeithaml 1981) and processing effort (McDougall 1987). Zeithaml postulated that most goods<br />

fell to the left of the tangibility-intangibility continuum because most goods were easy to<br />

evaluate, whereas most services fell to the right since most services were difficulty to evaluate.<br />

Empirically corroborating Zeithaml’s postulations, Goutaland (1999) found mental intangibility<br />

and generality to be positively related to difficulty of evaluation and no relationship between<br />

physical intangibility and difficulty of evaluation. Likewise, Breivik, Troye and Olsson (1998)<br />

found a positive association between generality and difficulty of evaluation but contrary to<br />

expectations, their empirical study also revealed that inaccessibility to the senses was negatively<br />

associated with perceived difficulty of evaluation.<br />

2.3. Perceived Risk<br />

2.3.1. Types of Perceived Risk<br />

Cox and Rich (1964) first identified two types of perceived risk namely, financial risk<br />

and social-psychological risk. Later on, Jacoby and Kaplan (1981) suggested that overall<br />

perceived risk should include performance risk, physical risk, social risk, psychological risk, and<br />

time risk. Extending previous conceptualizations, researchers identified six types of risk (i.e.,<br />

financial risk, performance risk, physical risk, psychological risk, social risk and convenience<br />

loss or time-related risk) (Murry and Schlacter 1990; Stone and Grønhaug 1993). Although<br />

Murry and Schlacter (1990) believed that all six types of risks were perceived as greater for<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!