17.01.2013 Views

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. Introduction<br />

Like inseparability, heterogeneity, and perishability, intangibility is one of the four major<br />

characteristics used to classify services (Rust et al. 1996; Shostack 1977; Zeithaml et al. 1985).<br />

Considered to be the key characteristic that differentiates products from services (Bebko 2000;<br />

Zeithaml and Bitner 2000), the role of intangibility has shifted from a service-exclusive term to a<br />

product-related one as well. Faced with the changes and challenges brought forth by a new<br />

category of virtual or semi-virtual products/services (e.g., Web browsers, MP3 music files),<br />

academicians are now equipped to study the effects of intangibility on perception of risk and<br />

evaluation difficulty using a three-dimensional intangibility construct. Developed by Laroche,<br />

Bergeron and Goutaland (2001), the intangibility construct now comprises three dimensions:<br />

physical intangibility, mental intangibility, and generality. Each of these dimensions may have a<br />

differential impact on consumers’ decision making processes both for branded and generic<br />

products/services. The importance of studying intangibility within a branding context rests on<br />

the premise that brands are believed to reduce consumers’ perceived risk and difficulty of<br />

evaluation.<br />

Given the dearth of research on intangibility, the focus of this study is, first, to confirm<br />

the with new data the three dimensions of intangibility (Laroche, Bergeron and Goutaland 2001)<br />

and then to study the effects of intangibility on perceived risk and difficulty of evaluation (for<br />

the proposed model, see Figure 1). Another aim of this study is to determine how knowledge and<br />

involvement, acting as moderators, affect the relationships between intangibility and difficulty of<br />

evaluation, and intangibility and perceived risk. By comparing generic products/services with<br />

branded ones, we also explore how the two strategies impact the relationships among the<br />

proposed constructs. The overall goal of this research is thus to determine whether branding<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!