17.01.2013 Views

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

validity. This raised a question about the respective contributions of concepts which share more than 50% of<br />

their variance, whether in characterizing the customer-brand relationship at a given moment or in predicting<br />

its impact on consumer behavior, particularly on loyalty (repurchase, price tolerance, resistance to change,<br />

positive word of mouth). An analysis of the relationships between these concepts showed that, if we admit<br />

that causal structure, the sequence "quality → <strong>value</strong> → <strong>satisfaction</strong> → <strong>trust</strong> → commitment" is the one that<br />

fits our data the best. Nonetheless, this causal structure merits further development at the theoretical level. In<br />

particular, we suggest that the causal structure of the chain may vary according to whether it is viewed from<br />

a transactional or cumulative perspective.<br />

This study suffers from several limitations and brings up a number of methodological questions for future<br />

research in relationship marketing. 1) We studied the brand-consumer relationship at a single moment, even<br />

though it is more of an incremental process, as Weitz and Jap (1995) already emphasized in their critique of<br />

the studies by Morgan and Hunt (1994) or Fournier (1998). 2) At the time of our surveys, it is difficult to<br />

guarantee that the object evaluated (even though it was clearly stated in the questionnaire) was the same for<br />

all respondents: Was it the institution, the brand, a particular product, a customer service manager? 3) The<br />

use of a single method could have artificially inflated the correlations, thus undervaluing the discriminant<br />

validity. Using the same method (Likert scales) to measure the same object (the relationship to the brand) at<br />

the same moment (one questionnaire) can create halo effects. 4) Since the response rate to the questionnaire<br />

was only 7.7%, our sample certainly suffered from representativity problems, even though it maintained the<br />

division of the population according to the major socio-demographic criteria. 5) Since banks mainly provide<br />

a "utilitarian" service, it would be interesting to see how the results evolve for more experiential products or<br />

services in fields like consumer food products, sports, leisure activities, or artistic pursuits.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!