Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2: Full Structural Model Fit FIT CRITERIA FULL MODEL Average Off-Diagonal Absolute Standardized Residuals 0.084 Distribution of Standardized Residuals Very good X 2 924.4 S-Bx2 767.5 Degrees of Freedom (df) 578 S-Bx2/df 1.33 NFI 0.82 NNFI 0.91 CFI 0.92 Adjusted CFI 0.94 RMSEA 0.048 226
Table 3: Statistical Significance of Regression Coefficients’ Estimates H Parameter estimate Standard error Test statistic Standardized estimate 1CHPS� ATTI H1a *(one-sided test) 0.068 1.608 0.144 11CHPS� INV H1b *** 0.039 2.951 0.206 CHPS� EXPB H1c **** 0.060 3.431 0.325 CHPS� PPURI H1d **** 0.068 4.569 0.378 CHPS� PURI H1e NS 0.096 0.534 0.041 STR� ATTI H2a *(one-sided test) 0.187 0.845 0.136 STR� INV H2b **** 0.090 5.920 0.619 STR� EXPB H2c NS 0.121 -1.137 -0.143 11STR� PURI H2d ** 0.235 2.515 0.307 EFF� ATTI H3a NS 0.167 0.934 0.104 EFF� INV H3b ** 0.113 2.192 0.223 11EFF� EXPB H3c *** 0.167 3.034 0.409 EFF� PPURI H3d *(one-sided test) 0.150 1.402 0.130 EFF� PURI H3e **(one-sided test) 0.219 1.805 0.159 ENT� ATTI H4a **(one-sided test) 0.086 1.889 0.235 11ENT� INV H4b *** 0.026 3.233 0.163 1INFO� ATTI H5a * 0.166 -2.083 -0.310 INFO� EXPB H5b ** 0.078 2.433 0.208 ATTI�PPURI H6a **** 0.092 4.987 0.423 ATTI� PURI H6b **(one-sided test) 0.116 1.884 0.132 EXPB� ATTI H7a NS 0.127 -0.043 -0.005 227
Page 1 and 2:
Volume 2 Contents: A Global Examina
Page 3 and 4:
A Global Examination Of Relationshi
Page 5 and 6:
and to measure them simultaneously
Page 7 and 8:
customers’ total consumption expe
Page 9 and 10:
From product perceived quality towa
Page 11 and 12:
cumulative, or a combination of the
Page 13 and 14:
trust4 -.68 commit1 .59 commit2 .51
Page 15 and 16:
we observed that the least correlat
Page 17 and 18:
outside of the consumption experien
Page 19 and 20:
REFERENCES Anderson Eugene W., Forn
Page 21 and 22:
Holbrook Morris B. Consumer Value:
Page 23 and 24:
APPENDIX 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE ITEM
Page 25 and 26:
An Empirical Examination of Retail
Page 27 and 28:
This paper is organized in the foll
Page 29 and 30:
Human and cognitive effort has been
Page 31 and 32:
Seiders, Berry, and Gresham (2000)
Page 33 and 34:
The four dimensions of retail conve
Page 35 and 36:
2000). In-store shoppers receive th
Page 37 and 38:
process resulted in slightly differ
Page 39 and 40:
examine the dimensionality of these
Page 41 and 42:
Seiders, Berry, and Gresham’s (20
Page 43 and 44:
used, and the respondents were all
Page 45 and 46:
Enis BM, Roering KJ. Product classi
Page 47 and 48:
Table 1 Dimensions of Convenience G
Page 49 and 50:
Table 3 Retail Convenience Scale Re
Page 51 and 52:
Table 5 Correlations, Means, and St
Page 53:
Error! Figure 1 Retail Convenience
Page 56 and 57:
and Novak, 1996; Hammond, McWilliam
Page 58 and 59:
and Hirschman, 1982, p 132). These
Page 60 and 61:
interpretations of, all factors par
Page 62 and 63:
the hedonic aspects of the online s
Page 64 and 65:
satisfaction (Oliver, 1980; Westbro
Page 66 and 67:
H6). It involves performing a multi
Page 68 and 69:
Differences between the “shopping
Page 70 and 71:
(Hypothesis 5) and online shopping
Page 72 and 73:
demonstrates the importance of meas
Page 74 and 75:
Dabholkar, Pratibha A. Incorporatin
Page 76 and 77:
Mano Haim Elliott Michael T. Smart
Page 78 and 79:
Zeithaml V., Parasuraman A. Malhotr
Page 80 and 81:
1. Introduction Like inseparability
Page 82 and 83:
specific attributes. Dealing with p
Page 84 and 85:
2.2. Perceived Difficulty of Evalua
Page 86 and 87:
and mentally intangible a product/s
Page 88 and 89:
2.4.1. Knowledge and Intangibility
Page 90 and 91:
category, we included both generic
Page 92 and 93:
goods exhibit higher levels of phys
Page 94 and 95:
5.1. Intangibility: Brand and Gener
Page 96 and 97:
greater involvement with the purcha
Page 98 and 99:
with generality, may also affect co
Page 100 and 101:
Berry LL, Clark T. Four ways to mak
Page 102 and 103:
Laroche M, Bergeron J, Goutaland C.
Page 104 and 105:
Questionnair es Questionnaire 1 Que
Page 106 and 107:
Table 3 Results of factor analysis
Page 108 and 109:
Table 4 Summary of results 108
Page 110 and 111:
Table 5 Stepwise multiple regressio
Page 112 and 113:
Table 8 Stepwise multiple regressio
Page 114 and 115:
114
Page 116 and 117:
Intangibility Physical intangibilit
Page 118 and 119:
net income of 94% and 119%, respect
Page 120 and 121:
this, it is not surprising that eBa
Page 122 and 123:
frequently referred to as feedback
Page 124 and 125:
An auction participants’ feedback
Page 126 and 127:
The objective of study one was to i
Page 128 and 129:
excerpts that were selected and fus
Page 130 and 131:
Consumers believed that sellers wit
Page 132 and 133:
negative feedback could be me,” a
Page 134 and 135:
idder should read the praises too b
Page 136 and 137:
first study focused on one class of
Page 138 and 139:
Rothkopf, Joydeep Srivastava, Rami
Page 140 and 141:
Industrial Economics. 50:3. 337-349
Page 142 and 143:
http://www.laxshopper.com/index.htm
Page 144 and 145:
144
Page 146 and 147:
Firstly, the consumer is supposed t
Page 148 and 149:
For the psycho-sociology of environ
Page 150 and 151:
To analyse appropriation strategies
Page 152 and 153:
The second strategy is the most ela
Page 154 and 155:
From the appropriation perspective
Page 156 and 157:
To test these hypotheses we selecte
Page 158 and 159:
Glace Glace Chart 4. Spatial config
Page 160 and 161:
Chart 5b. Spatial configuration of
Page 162 and 163:
No differences between the three di
Page 164 and 165:
appropriation strategies adopted by
Page 166 and 167:
A matrix of space management can th
Page 168 and 169:
Holbrook M.B. (1999), Introduction
Page 170 and 171:
Asymmetric Quality Tier Competition
Page 172 and 173:
Wisniewski (1989) proposed a theory
Page 174 and 175:
alternatives prior to the choice de
Page 176 and 177: decrease in tradeoff when L reduces
Page 178 and 179: As Bronnenberg and Wathieu (1996) u
Page 180 and 181: Those conceptually based utility fu
Page 182 and 183: ecent existing research (Sivakumar
Page 184 and 185: increased by 10% (conceptually the
Page 186 and 187: REFERENCES Allenby GM. A unified ap
Page 188 and 189: Table 1. Estimation Results _______
Page 190 and 191: Q U A L I T a H H’ x b PRICE 190
Page 192 and 193: MODELING THE IMPACT OF INTERNET ATM
Page 194 and 195: Eroglu et al (2001) proposed a typo
Page 196 and 197: playfulness (enjoy visiting Web sit
Page 198 and 199: H2: When consumers surf the Web, th
Page 200 and 201: significantly explain attitude towa
Page 202 and 203: Involvement toward an ad based on v
Page 204 and 205: usefulness and the resourcefulness
Page 206 and 207: 3.2.2.2. Involvement The final comp
Page 208 and 209: environmental cues on purchase beha
Page 210 and 211: 6. Test of Hypotheses [Insert table
Page 212 and 213: Cacioppo, Schumann, 1983; Petty and
Page 214 and 215: Pelsmacker et al, 1998). ATTI is li
Page 216 and 217: improvements are brought into navig
Page 218 and 219: Cho, C.H.: How Advertising Works on
Page 220 and 221: Liu, C. and Arnett, K.P. Exploring
Page 222 and 223: Rose, G., Khoo, H. and Straub, D.W.
Page 224 and 225: Table 1: Results of Confirmatory Fa
Page 228 and 229: EXPB� INV H7b NS 0.080 0.062 0.00
Page 230 and 231: 230
Page 232 and 233: MAPPING RETAILING ENTREPRENEUR DECI
Page 234 and 235: Attempts to use a framework to find
Page 236 and 237: attempts resulting in failure are n
Page 238 and 239: included in this sentence would be
Page 240 and 241: Detailed causal maps are needed in
Page 242 and 243: Start-up. Details of the stream of
Page 244 and 245: more successful when they avoid big
Page 246 and 247: Axelrod, Robert (1976), "The Cognit
Page 248 and 249: 1. Brian Shore starts several + 2.
Page 250 and 251: + 1. B.S. ‘Maximizes use of fryin
Page 252 and 253: degree of importance consumers plac
Page 254 and 255: initial use of the word “convenie
Page 256 and 257: In the decision-making process, tim
Page 258 and 259: at home 24 hr/7 days a week (Hofack
Page 260 and 261: Figure 1 about here ---------------
Page 262 and 263: the organization and design of the
Page 264 and 265: ehavior courses participated as bot
Page 266 and 267: convenience is different for the tw
Page 268 and 269: should seek to establish a similar
Page 270 and 271: obtained a small sample size of onl
Page 272 and 273: Dunn DT, Thomas CA, Lubawski JL. Pi
Page 274 and 275: Table 1 Dimensions of Convenience G
Page 276 and 277:
Table 3 Retail Convenience Scale Re
Page 278 and 279:
Table 5 Correlations, Means, and St
Page 280 and 281:
Error! Figure 1 Retail Convenience
Page 282 and 283:
Customer-to-customer interaction is
Page 284 and 285:
Second, we need to find out the opt
Page 286 and 287:
esponse to the behavior of other cu
Page 288 and 289:
ewards (Swinyard 1993). A customer
Page 290 and 291:
Values may be defined as beliefs th
Page 292 and 293:
find out the optimal combination of
Page 294 and 295:
Taguchi recommends the use of signa
Page 296 and 297:
epresent higher tolerance of incomp
Page 298 and 299:
estaurant where they can escape inc
Page 300 and 301:
Three significant interaction terms
Page 302 and 303:
McGrath, Mary Ann, Otnes, Cele, (19
Page 304 and 305:
Table…2 Tests of Between-Subjects
Page 306 and 307:
Figure…2 (a) Combination of L4 Ta
show all

Quality, value, satisfaction, trust, a

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?