28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CATEGORY 6: OBJECTS EMPLOYED IN WEIGHING AND MEASURING<br />

SCALES<br />

Descriptions of the use of both the balance and the<br />

steelyard can be found in Kisch 1966, 26-52 and<br />

Liversidge 1973, 176-7.<br />

Balance (scale with beam arms of equal length;<br />

libra) (Fig 103; 2507)<br />

2507 Fig 103 SF LWC 453(C), B165 F70. Cellar backfill. Period 5.<br />

<strong>The</strong> arm of an equipoise balance with a central pierced lug<br />

for suspension and pierced decorative terminals for<br />

attaching the scale pans. Each half of the arm is graduated<br />

by eleven punched dots into twelve divisions, each division<br />

probably representing one ounce, uncia (27.29 gm). <strong>The</strong><br />

balance could therefore be used with a rider-counterpiece<br />

suspended on the various graduated spots along the arm as<br />

well as with weights in the scale pan (Kisch 1966, 36, 66).<br />

Length of the arm 253.0 mm. A complete balance with pans<br />

is illustrated in Ward-Perkins and Claridge 1976, catalogue<br />

no 249.<br />

Steelyard (scale with beam arms of unequal length;<br />

statera) (Fig 104; 2508)<br />

2508 Fig 104 SF BKC 3463(C), J275. On floor of building<br />

destroyed in AD 60/1. <strong>The</strong> arm and scale pan of a steelyard,<br />

total length 215.0 mm. <strong>The</strong> chains probably used to suspend<br />

the pan from the arm are missing, as is the counterweight.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pan was suspended from the very end of the thick part of<br />

the arm, and the counterweight moved along the points of<br />

the graduated scale until equilibrium was achieved, ie when<br />

the weight suspended times the distance along the arm<br />

were equal to either side of the fulcrum. This example, as is<br />

usual, has two suspension hooks providing two different<br />

fulcra, each with a corresponding scale marked on the arm<br />

(see Kisch 1966, 66). <strong>The</strong> scale on the face corresponding to<br />

the hook furthest in from the pan's suspension ring is<br />

divided into six by slight transverse grooves, each length<br />

thus given then being subdivided by eleven punched dots.<br />

Each groove represents a pound, libra (327.45 gm) and each<br />

dot an ounce, uncia (27.29 gm) of which there were twelve<br />

to the <strong>Roman</strong> pound. Below this scale, opposite the sixth dot<br />

of each pound, is inscribed an S formed by two crescents,<br />

representing semis, or six ounces (163.73 gm) (ibid, table<br />

12, chart 9). <strong>The</strong> other scale is less well preserved, but would<br />

appear to be marked out with a combination of transverse<br />

grooves and <strong>Roman</strong> numerals. (Numerals were used to mark<br />

the scales on a steelyard from Pompeii (Ward-Perkins and<br />

Claridge 1976, catalogue no 248), and a combination of<br />

numerals, grooves and dots defined one of the scales on a<br />

steelyard from Richborough, Kent (Henderson 1949, pl 38).)<br />

Despite the poor condition of the scale, it is possible to<br />

deduce the unit of measure involved and the minimum and<br />

maximum weight represented at each end.<br />

Fig 103 Balance arm (1:2)<br />

99<br />

<strong>The</strong> fulcrum provided by the outer hook on a steelyard<br />

involves the measuring of much greater weights than does<br />

that provided by the inner hook. It was usual for this greater<br />

scale to take up more or less where the lower scale left off<br />

(ibid, 131; Ward-Perkins and Claridge 1976, catalogue no<br />

248). <strong>The</strong>refore with a measure from 0 to 6 pounds on the<br />

lower scale, the first stop on the greater scale should<br />

represent 6 pounds. That this is so can be checked, for if the<br />

first stop represents 6 pounds and if each subsequent stop<br />

represents a pound, then the distance between the first stop<br />

and nought, ie the centre of the fulcrum, should be<br />

equivalent to that of six of the units marked on the arm. This<br />

is indeed the case. Each unit (ie each pound) in the greater<br />

scale measures approximately 5.0mm. <strong>The</strong> distance from<br />

the centre of the fulcrum to the last transverse groove<br />

marked on the arm is about 200.0mm, therefore up to 40<br />

<strong>Roman</strong> pounds (just over 28.5 modern pounds) can be<br />

weighed using the outer fulcrum, and the stops marked on<br />

the arm ran from 6 to 40 pounds at one pound intervals.<br />

Traces of <strong>Roman</strong> numerals can be distinguished at intervals<br />

along the scale. However, apart from the row of three Xs<br />

(possibly with other numerals) near the end of the arm, the<br />

mid point of the central one of which lies at the point for 35,<br />

there seems to be no correspondence between the<br />

numerals and the more obvious divisions of the scale, ie at 5<br />

or 10 pound intervals.<br />

On the thin edge of the thick part of the arm uppermost when<br />

the 6 to 40 pound scale is in use, traces of other letters or<br />

numerals are visible. Nearest to the outermost hook is a<br />

letter or numeral C (on its back in the illustration) and a<br />

transverse groove. At least three other Cs can be<br />

distinguished. As the other faces of that part of the arm are<br />

blank, this is unlikely to be a decorative feature, and could be<br />

expected to relate in some way to the scale, though how has<br />

not been established.<br />

<strong>The</strong> scale pan (found close to the steelyard arm) has a central<br />

perforation 5.5 mm in diameter. <strong>The</strong> rim of the pan has been<br />

folded over and there are two slight grooves round the<br />

outside of the pan below, and at intervals equivalent to, the<br />

depth of the fold. <strong>The</strong>se grooves show through the metal on<br />

the inside of the pan. <strong>The</strong> roughly-made rim makes it<br />

unlikely that the pan was cast. Either spinning or turning<br />

(Hodges 1976, 74-5) seems to be indicated. Riveted to the<br />

pan at slightly unequal distances are three fittings (similar to<br />

harness strap-loops, Fig 149). Each fitting has a penannular<br />

ring passed through it which would have connected the<br />

chains or threads used to suspend the pan from the arm. A<br />

similar ring is fitted through the suspension hole at the end<br />

of the steelyard arm. <strong>The</strong> diameter of the pan is<br />

approximately 90.5 mm, its depth about 23.0 mm. Since the<br />

pan is perforated and the steelyard could apparently be used<br />

for large weights, it is apparent that this scale was not used<br />

for the minute quantities involved in pharmaceutical<br />

weighing, but for ordinary household or commercial<br />

weighing of solid goods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!