Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CATEGORY 6: OBJECTS EMPLOYED IN WEIGHING AND MEASURING<br />
SCALES<br />
Descriptions of the use of both the balance and the<br />
steelyard can be found in Kisch 1966, 26-52 and<br />
Liversidge 1973, 176-7.<br />
Balance (scale with beam arms of equal length;<br />
libra) (Fig 103; 2507)<br />
2507 Fig 103 SF LWC 453(C), B165 F70. Cellar backfill. Period 5.<br />
<strong>The</strong> arm of an equipoise balance with a central pierced lug<br />
for suspension and pierced decorative terminals for<br />
attaching the scale pans. Each half of the arm is graduated<br />
by eleven punched dots into twelve divisions, each division<br />
probably representing one ounce, uncia (27.29 gm). <strong>The</strong><br />
balance could therefore be used with a rider-counterpiece<br />
suspended on the various graduated spots along the arm as<br />
well as with weights in the scale pan (Kisch 1966, 36, 66).<br />
Length of the arm 253.0 mm. A complete balance with pans<br />
is illustrated in Ward-Perkins and Claridge 1976, catalogue<br />
no 249.<br />
Steelyard (scale with beam arms of unequal length;<br />
statera) (Fig 104; 2508)<br />
2508 Fig 104 SF BKC 3463(C), J275. On floor of building<br />
destroyed in AD 60/1. <strong>The</strong> arm and scale pan of a steelyard,<br />
total length 215.0 mm. <strong>The</strong> chains probably used to suspend<br />
the pan from the arm are missing, as is the counterweight.<br />
<strong>The</strong> pan was suspended from the very end of the thick part of<br />
the arm, and the counterweight moved along the points of<br />
the graduated scale until equilibrium was achieved, ie when<br />
the weight suspended times the distance along the arm<br />
were equal to either side of the fulcrum. This example, as is<br />
usual, has two suspension hooks providing two different<br />
fulcra, each with a corresponding scale marked on the arm<br />
(see Kisch 1966, 66). <strong>The</strong> scale on the face corresponding to<br />
the hook furthest in from the pan's suspension ring is<br />
divided into six by slight transverse grooves, each length<br />
thus given then being subdivided by eleven punched dots.<br />
Each groove represents a pound, libra (327.45 gm) and each<br />
dot an ounce, uncia (27.29 gm) of which there were twelve<br />
to the <strong>Roman</strong> pound. Below this scale, opposite the sixth dot<br />
of each pound, is inscribed an S formed by two crescents,<br />
representing semis, or six ounces (163.73 gm) (ibid, table<br />
12, chart 9). <strong>The</strong> other scale is less well preserved, but would<br />
appear to be marked out with a combination of transverse<br />
grooves and <strong>Roman</strong> numerals. (Numerals were used to mark<br />
the scales on a steelyard from Pompeii (Ward-Perkins and<br />
Claridge 1976, catalogue no 248), and a combination of<br />
numerals, grooves and dots defined one of the scales on a<br />
steelyard from Richborough, Kent (Henderson 1949, pl 38).)<br />
Despite the poor condition of the scale, it is possible to<br />
deduce the unit of measure involved and the minimum and<br />
maximum weight represented at each end.<br />
Fig 103 Balance arm (1:2)<br />
99<br />
<strong>The</strong> fulcrum provided by the outer hook on a steelyard<br />
involves the measuring of much greater weights than does<br />
that provided by the inner hook. It was usual for this greater<br />
scale to take up more or less where the lower scale left off<br />
(ibid, 131; Ward-Perkins and Claridge 1976, catalogue no<br />
248). <strong>The</strong>refore with a measure from 0 to 6 pounds on the<br />
lower scale, the first stop on the greater scale should<br />
represent 6 pounds. That this is so can be checked, for if the<br />
first stop represents 6 pounds and if each subsequent stop<br />
represents a pound, then the distance between the first stop<br />
and nought, ie the centre of the fulcrum, should be<br />
equivalent to that of six of the units marked on the arm. This<br />
is indeed the case. Each unit (ie each pound) in the greater<br />
scale measures approximately 5.0mm. <strong>The</strong> distance from<br />
the centre of the fulcrum to the last transverse groove<br />
marked on the arm is about 200.0mm, therefore up to 40<br />
<strong>Roman</strong> pounds (just over 28.5 modern pounds) can be<br />
weighed using the outer fulcrum, and the stops marked on<br />
the arm ran from 6 to 40 pounds at one pound intervals.<br />
Traces of <strong>Roman</strong> numerals can be distinguished at intervals<br />
along the scale. However, apart from the row of three Xs<br />
(possibly with other numerals) near the end of the arm, the<br />
mid point of the central one of which lies at the point for 35,<br />
there seems to be no correspondence between the<br />
numerals and the more obvious divisions of the scale, ie at 5<br />
or 10 pound intervals.<br />
On the thin edge of the thick part of the arm uppermost when<br />
the 6 to 40 pound scale is in use, traces of other letters or<br />
numerals are visible. Nearest to the outermost hook is a<br />
letter or numeral C (on its back in the illustration) and a<br />
transverse groove. At least three other Cs can be<br />
distinguished. As the other faces of that part of the arm are<br />
blank, this is unlikely to be a decorative feature, and could be<br />
expected to relate in some way to the scale, though how has<br />
not been established.<br />
<strong>The</strong> scale pan (found close to the steelyard arm) has a central<br />
perforation 5.5 mm in diameter. <strong>The</strong> rim of the pan has been<br />
folded over and there are two slight grooves round the<br />
outside of the pan below, and at intervals equivalent to, the<br />
depth of the fold. <strong>The</strong>se grooves show through the metal on<br />
the inside of the pan. <strong>The</strong> roughly-made rim makes it<br />
unlikely that the pan was cast. Either spinning or turning<br />
(Hodges 1976, 74-5) seems to be indicated. Riveted to the<br />
pan at slightly unequal distances are three fittings (similar to<br />
harness strap-loops, Fig 149). Each fitting has a penannular<br />
ring passed through it which would have connected the<br />
chains or threads used to suspend the pan from the arm. A<br />
similar ring is fitted through the suspension hole at the end<br />
of the steelyard arm. <strong>The</strong> diameter of the pan is<br />
approximately 90.5 mm, its depth about 23.0 mm. Since the<br />
pan is perforated and the steelyard could apparently be used<br />
for large weights, it is apparent that this scale was not used<br />
for the minute quantities involved in pharmaceutical<br />
weighing, but for ordinary household or commercial<br />
weighing of solid goods.