28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

worked bone and antler have been found on several of<br />

the sites excavated from 1971-9 in <strong>Colchester</strong><br />

(4306-4395).<br />

It would be surprising if there were no evidence of<br />

varying taste and style in bone pins: not only regional<br />

variations but, if some domestic manufacture is<br />

accepted, even between households. It is, therefore, a<br />

disappointment to see only six standard head-types in<br />

<strong>Colchester</strong>, and to see how these types recur<br />

throughout the province. Given that bone pins fall<br />

into limited head-types despite the potential of bone<br />

as a medium and the probability that some, if not<br />

most, were home-made, we should attempt to find a<br />

non-domestic factor influencing their design. Such a<br />

factor can readily be found in metal and jet pins, many<br />

of whose head-types are the same as those of bone<br />

pins yet whose manufacture must have been<br />

commercial and based in a workshop. Casting bronze<br />

requires specialist tools and equipment and specialist<br />

knowledge. Jet is a rare and expensive material found<br />

in Britain only in the area of Whitby, North Yorkshire,<br />

and there is no positive evidence for its export in the<br />

raw state. Metal and jet pins were therefore objects of<br />

some intrinsic and artistic value, and the recurrence<br />

of their head-types on bone pins suggests that the<br />

latter were copies made locally at comparatively low<br />

cost. Some early bone pins are stained green, and an<br />

early pin stained red has recently been found in<br />

<strong>Colchester</strong> 10<br />

. <strong>The</strong> use of these two colours could<br />

indicate attempts at imitating copper-alloy pins.<br />

<strong>The</strong> weakness of the simple tapering shaft of Types 1<br />

and 2 and some examples of Type 6 is that the shaft is<br />

liable to break under pressure at any point. An<br />

advantage is that a broken pin would still be wellbalanced<br />

and reusable if repointed at any length. <strong>The</strong><br />

swollen shaft which occurs on Types 3, 4, 5, and the<br />

majority of Type 6, was probably introduced as an<br />

attempt to strengthen the weakness of the earlier<br />

straight thin shaft. <strong>The</strong> success of this innovation can<br />

be judged by the percentage of surviving whole<br />

examples (not including repointed ones) of each type:<br />

Type 1 17%; Type 2 6%; Type 3 44.5%; Type<br />

4 43.5%; Type 5 27% (this low figure can be offset by<br />

the high number, 18%, of pins of this type that have<br />

2.0 mm or less of the total length missing); Type 6, of 3<br />

plain tapering shafts none survive intact, of 12<br />

swollen shafts 25% survive. An alternative<br />

explanation for the swollen waist could be that on<br />

pins with a head standing proud of the shaft, a<br />

counterweight was necessary to achieve a wellbalanced<br />

pin. <strong>The</strong> consequent greater strength of the<br />

shaft would therefore have been an added bonus.<br />

Type 1. Pins with a plain conical head (Fig 17; 104-<br />

155). This pin is simply a plain tapering shaft, the<br />

thicker end of which has been sharpened to a short<br />

point. <strong>The</strong> shaft is thin, with the maximum width<br />

immediately below the head varying from 2.0 to<br />

6.0mm (two examples meauring respectively 7.5<br />

amd 8.0mm are possibly not pins). Only nine<br />

complete examples survive, varying from 88.0 to<br />

122.5 mm long. Three others have been repointed<br />

20<br />

Fig 17 Bone hairpins: Type 1 (1:1)<br />

after breaking. <strong>The</strong>se measure 79.0, 74.0 and<br />

69.5 mm. Obviously more examples than the three<br />

recognized here could have been repointed and then<br />

broken again. As well as the two very thick examples,<br />

another five which stand apart from the general<br />

group as shorter and proportionally thicker are also<br />

possibly not pins (see bone pegs 4465-4472).<br />

All the examples of Type 1 are well made. Slight knife<br />

and/or rasp marks are sometimes visible on the shaft<br />

which is regular, smooth and often highly polished.<br />

<strong>The</strong> short conical head is usually comparatively<br />

crude, being the result of a few strokes of a knife,<br />

though some examples are smooth and slightly<br />

rounded, probably from use. Four have been stained<br />

green, probably with a vegetable dye (104, 108, 110,<br />

114). This staining has also been noted on a Type 2<br />

pin at York (MacGregor 1978, 35; also note 1) and on<br />

a "plain", probably Type 1, pin at Rochester, Kent<br />

(Harrison 1972, 155). 11<br />

<strong>The</strong> practice appears to be<br />

restricted to the two early types of pin.<br />

Type 1 pins are found in deposits ranging in date from<br />

?FIavian to 4th-century. <strong>The</strong> date of manufacture of<br />

this pin is discussed under Type 2.<br />

113 Fig 17 SF LWC 2945. J738 F180 Road ditch. Period 4.<br />

122.5mm long. Complete. Head worn.<br />

122 Fig 17 SF BKC 3375(C), J142 F13. Large pit. Period 5b.<br />

74.0mm long Probably carefully repointed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!