28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CATEGORY8: OBJECTS ASSOCIATED WITH TRANSPORT<br />

All the catalogued items connected with transport are<br />

from horse or oxen equipment except the ?cart fitting,<br />

2545. Harness from both ridden and driven animals<br />

is no doubt represented here, but it is not always<br />

possible to distinguish between the two (eg straploops).<br />

Also, there is not always a positive means of<br />

distinguishing cavalry from civilian harness. Where<br />

an item seems likely to be military from its context it<br />

has been catalogued under military equipment.<br />

HARNESS<br />

Hipposandal (Fig 108; 2536). Discussions of the<br />

precise function of hipposandals can be found in<br />

Manning 1972, 171, Ward 1941, 26-7, and Clark<br />

1976, 236-7.<br />

2536 Fig 108 SF BUC 1215(C), CI 661 L4. Modern. Iron. Length<br />

217.0mm, width (incomplete) 109.5mm, height 117.5mm.<br />

Hipposandals have been classified into three types (by<br />

Aubert, see Manning 1972, 171). This example belongs to<br />

Type 1, with a long hooked rod at the front, side-wings, and a<br />

hooked heel. One side-wing is missing.<br />

Bridles (Fig 109; 2537-2538). No metal fragments<br />

Fig 108 Hipposandal (1:2)<br />

105<br />

from bridles have been found or recognized. <strong>The</strong> two<br />

objects described here are cheekpieces, which lie<br />

outside the horse's mouth against the cheek and thus<br />

prevent the bit from sliding through the mouth (Green<br />

1977, 41).<br />

2537 Fig 109 SF LWC 4194, J214 F112. Pit. Post-<strong>Roman</strong>. A<br />

pierced ?deer phalange, possibly used as a cheekpiece for a<br />

leather bit (ORL 8, 182, pl 20, 91, 92). Length 56.5 mm,<br />

maximum width 18.0mm, maximum diameter of oval<br />

perforation 7.0mm. Possibly post-<strong>Roman</strong>.<br />

2538 Fig 109 SF IRA 1, 5 F5. Pit. Mid to late 1st century. A<br />

fragment of an antler cheekpiece for use with a leather bit.<br />

<strong>The</strong> object appears to be well polished, possibly the result of<br />

wear. In contrast, it has been quite roughly made. Crude cuts<br />

are visible round the perforation, at the broad broken end,<br />

and at the inset section. Similar cheekpieces are found from<br />

the prehistoric period onwards in both Europe and Asia<br />

(Roes 1960, 68-72; Britnell 1976; Foltiny 1967). A<br />

suggested alternative use for less well-worn examples is<br />

that they may be crude needles used in the manufacture of<br />

twig or rush matting or thatching (Roes 1960, 71-2). Length<br />

88.0mm, maximum diameter 19.0mm.<br />

Strap-loops (2539-2541). Only fragments of straploops<br />

identified as ?civilian were found. Not<br />

illustrated; in microfiche catalogue. Cavalry straploops<br />

are catalogued under military equipment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!