28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> nail-cleaner and the third piece have a suspension loop<br />

formed by turning the top of the shaft over. <strong>The</strong> pieces are<br />

hung from a piece of wire with a simple twisted knot.<br />

Probably late 3rd- to 4th-century.<br />

SPATULAS (Fig 68; 1946-1950)<br />

Spatulas often form one end of a double-ended<br />

instrument, for example the spathomele, or spatulaprobe,<br />

and the scalpel, the handle of which can carry<br />

a leaf-shaped spatula. <strong>The</strong> spathomele was generally<br />

used for pharmaceutical purposes, such as mixing<br />

and applying ointments (Milne 1970, 58), while a<br />

spatula in association with a scalpel implies surgical<br />

use as a blunt dissector (ibid, 24, 84-5). None of our<br />

catalogued examples is complete, but 1948 was<br />

certainly not double-ended, and resembles blunt<br />

dissectors (ibid, pl 20, 3,4), and 1950 appears to be a<br />

single-ended instrument too <strong>small</strong> for any use other<br />

than spreading or mixing. Most examples are cast,<br />

but some are beaten out. All are of copper alloy.<br />

1947 Fig 68 SF LWC 3517(C), K239. ?Garden soil. Period 4? or<br />

post-<strong>Roman</strong>? Most of the shaft is missing. Bent (drawn<br />

straight). Length 106.0mm. Cast. Waisted leaf-shaped<br />

blade with double edge. <strong>The</strong> shaft has four ridges running<br />

along its length. Similar to Wheeler 1930, pl 37, 1.<br />

1948 Fig 68 SF BKC 2305(C), G246 F61. Clay- and timber-lined<br />

pit. Period 5b. Bent. Length 128.5 mm. Cast. Leaf-shaped<br />

blade with double edge. <strong>The</strong> shaft tapers slightly and is<br />

octagonal in section. At the top of the shaft is a short<br />

Fig 68 Spatulas (1:1)<br />

63<br />

projecting tang, the underside of which has a groove<br />

between two transverse mouldings at the tip. <strong>The</strong> spatula<br />

could have had a bone handle (though the tang is rather<br />

short for this) or was more likely a folding instrument with a<br />

metal handle (cf Milne 1970, pl 20, 3, 4).<br />

1949 Fig 68 SF BKC 5135(C), V158 F62. Pit. Period 5 (or 6)?<br />

Fragment. Most of the shaft and the tip of the blade are<br />

missing. Length 67.5mm. A crude spatula, with a beaten<br />

blade.<br />

1950 Fig 68 SF CGC5, 37 F6a. Pit. <strong>Roman</strong>; no earlier than the late<br />

2nd century. <strong>The</strong> tip of the shaft is missing. Bent. Length<br />

100.5 mm. <strong>The</strong> lozenge-shaped blade is very <strong>small</strong>. <strong>The</strong><br />

instrument seems to have been cut from a sheet of copper<br />

alloy and the shaft formed by folding the edges of the cut<br />

piece upwards and inwards. This piece may more correctly<br />

belong with the spoons.<br />

OCULIST'S STAMPS (Fig69; 1951 -1953)<br />

Mark Hassall has provided the following report:<br />

Recent excavations in <strong>Colchester</strong> have produced one<br />

certain example of an oculist's stamp and possibly<br />

two others. 3<br />

1951 Fig 69 SF BKC 3321, J194 F13. Large pit. Period 5b. Green<br />

slate 4<br />

oculist's stamp, 31.0 by 20.0mm square, 2.5mm<br />

thick. 5<br />

One of the longer sides has been inscribed (a) and on<br />

the corresponding side a similar text (b) has been lightly<br />

scratched as if to mark out the letters for a second stamp.<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence of an M at both ends of (b) suggests that the<br />

writer had originally forgotten to write retrograde, and the<br />

die may not have been cut for this reason. Both texts are<br />

retrograde with the exception in (a) of the letter L: (a)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!