28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2131 Fig 85 SF BKC 2723(C), H111 F33. Rubbish pit. Period 5c.<br />

Iron handle fragment with flat rectangular section loop.<br />

2132 Fig 85 SF BKC 2774(C), H239 F68. Hearth over pit. Period 5c.<br />

Large thick handle with bud-like terminals. <strong>The</strong> section is a<br />

slightly flattened circle at the mid-point of the loop and<br />

rather more flattened towards the terminals.<br />

2134 Fig 85 SF BKC 3261 (C), J181 L25. Dump. Period 5c/6. Drophandle<br />

decoratively moulded terminals, part of one bend is<br />

missing. <strong>The</strong> two split-pins which fixed the handle to the<br />

drawer or box still survive. One is rather larger than the<br />

other. <strong>The</strong> loop of the handle is lozenge-shaped in section,<br />

becoming circular towards the terminals. Length<br />

approximately 54.0mm.<br />

2137 Fig 85 SF BKC 4877(C), T426. Period 1 (or 2). Iron twisted<br />

drop-handle, both terminals are damaged. Length 84.5mm.<br />

2142 Fig 85 SF BUC 566, C11 28 L1. Period 2. Tiny drop-handle of<br />

rectangular section. Length 19.5 mm.<br />

2145 Fig 85 SF COC 204, 975 L280. Dump. Period 3. Drop-handle<br />

with square section loop and circular section plain<br />

terminals. Length 65.5 mm.<br />

Copper-alloy furniture fragments (Fig 86; 2146-<br />

2149). Pieces to be considered as probably the<br />

sources of the following few fragments include <strong>small</strong><br />

tables, stools, lamp stands (candelabra), portable<br />

altars or figurine bases. Valuable groups of illustrated<br />

examples can be found in Ward-Perkins and Claridge<br />

1976. Given the size of the fragments catalogued<br />

here it is impossible to attempt to draw conclusions as<br />

to the specific items of furniture represented.<br />

2146 Fig 86 SF LWC 3200(C), J951. Make-up. Period 3. Very<br />

corroded and laminated ?foot. Height 28.0mm.<br />

2148 Fig 86 SF BUC 97, A408 G33. Grave fill. Period 2. Fragment<br />

broken across a perforation in the upper surface. Height<br />

17.5 mm.<br />

Fig 86 Fragments from copper-alloy items of furniture (1:1)<br />

82<br />

2149 Fig 86 SF BUC 876, E52 L6. Destruction debris and topsoil.<br />

Post-<strong>Roman</strong>. A four-toed foot. <strong>The</strong> two middle toes do not<br />

touch the ground. <strong>The</strong>re is a ?rivet hole at the base of the<br />

upright element, with another on the line of the fracture.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se could indicate that the foot was fixed to the leg of a<br />

wooden piece of furniture. Height 21.0mm.<br />

Bone inlay (Figs 87 and 88; 2150-2162). Thin<br />

strips of bone, often decorated with incised geometric<br />

patterns, were used principally as casings for wooden<br />

boxes or caskets. Groups of inlay strips from boxes<br />

are illustrated in Henderson 1949, pl 58 and Wilson<br />

1968, pls 61 -2. A complete box of decorated bone is<br />

known from Heilbronn (Goessler 1932, 294). Larger<br />

items of furniture could also be decorated with bone<br />

inlay (Nicholls 1979; Crummy 1981; see pp 152-60).<br />

2150 Fig 87 SF LWC 750, B321 F70. Cellar backfill. Period 5. Inlay<br />

strip decorated along each long side with a row of incised<br />

single ring-and-dot and down the centre with a row of<br />

double ring-and-dot motifs. <strong>The</strong> decoration would have been<br />

cut with a compass-like engraving tool (Goessler 1932, Abb<br />

3). <strong>The</strong> undersurface has been well smoothed. Length<br />

77.5mm, width 19.0mm, thickness 1.5 to 2.0mm.<br />

2151 Fig 87 SF LWC 1744, D161. Dump or make-up? Post-<br />

<strong>Roman</strong>. Inlay strip with badly scarred upper surface. <strong>The</strong><br />

decoration consists of five triple ring-and-dot motifs, one at<br />

each corner and one in the centre, two double ring-and-dots<br />

at the centre of each long side, and pairs of single ring-anddots<br />

between each of the five triple-ringed elements. A<br />

grooved line runs from the inside edge of each double ringand-dot<br />

to the outer edge of each corner triple ring-and-dot<br />

and gives some cohesion to an otherwise loose, complex<br />

pattern. <strong>The</strong> undersurface has been smoothed but bears<br />

several thin scratches across its width. <strong>The</strong>re is a <strong>small</strong><br />

perforation at the middle of the central triple-ringed motif,<br />

probably to take a <strong>small</strong> fixing peg. <strong>The</strong> sides are quite<br />

irregular. Length 42.0mm, width 25.0mm, thickness<br />

3.0mm.<br />

2152 Fig 87 SF LWC 3895, G489. Dump or make-up. Period 2. A<br />

<strong>small</strong> thick piece of inlay with two deep parallel grooves. <strong>The</strong><br />

undersurface is rough cancellous tissue. Length 22.0mm,<br />

width 9.0mm, thickness 3.5mm.<br />

2153 Fig 87 SF LWC 1798, H36 F10. Road ditch. <strong>Roman</strong>. A plain<br />

mitred strip of inlay. <strong>The</strong> end opposite to the mitred corner is<br />

broken. Both surfaces are smooth. <strong>The</strong> upper face still<br />

shows traces of saw and/or rasp marks, and parts of the<br />

lower are rough with cancellous tissue. Length 75.0mm,<br />

width 11.5mm, thickness 3.0mm.<br />

2154 Fig 87 SF LWC 4055, R30. Destruction debris. Period 4 or<br />

post-<strong>Roman</strong>. A <strong>small</strong> strip with two parallel grooves. <strong>The</strong><br />

reverse shows coarse saw marks. Length 27.5 mm, width<br />

9.0mm, thickness 2.0mm.<br />

2155 Fig 87 SF BKC 2856(C), H288 L13. Dump. Period 5b (end)<br />

and possibly into 5c and 6. A piece of stepped inlay with one<br />

convex step on one long side and two on the other,<br />

somewhat similar to the stepped inlay from the Butt Road<br />

workshop (Fig 190). <strong>The</strong>re is a peg hole near each end, and<br />

one peg survives. <strong>The</strong>re is slight green staining, probably<br />

from contact with copper alloy, round one peg hole. <strong>The</strong><br />

underside shows rasp marks. <strong>The</strong> piece was made from a<br />

long bone or metapodial. <strong>The</strong> bone is very dense and may be<br />

horse bone. Length 62.5 mm, width 19.5 mm, maximum<br />

thickness 4.0mm. <strong>The</strong> peg is 22.5mm long and has a<br />

maximum diameter of 4.0mm.<br />

2156 Fig 87 SF BKC 2783(C), H298 (F94+F167). Pits. Period 6.<br />

Ansate strip of inlay, with incised ring-and-dot and line<br />

decoration. Both ends are damaged. <strong>The</strong> central panel has<br />

three large double ring-and-dot elements, with the area<br />

between the two rings filled in with alternating large and<br />

<strong>small</strong> single ring-and-dot ornament. <strong>The</strong>re is a single ringand-dot<br />

at each corner of the central panel and double ringand-dot<br />

motifs between them on each long side, opposite<br />

the gaps between the large elements. Grooved lines link the<br />

outer edge of this row of four with the inner edges. Filling in<br />

the short sides of the central panel is a row of three <strong>small</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!