28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the teeth.<br />

1857 Fig 59 SF BUC 1529, H181 G487. grave deposit. Period 2.<br />

Fragmentary comb. Length 118.0 mm, total width 53.5 mm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> connecting plates are relatively narrow, 15.0mm<br />

across, and have a complex profile of hollow chamfers and<br />

grooves with transverse mouldings between the seven iron<br />

rivets. <strong>The</strong> long sides are scarred from tooth-cutting. <strong>The</strong><br />

ends are quite badly decayed. <strong>The</strong> best preserved may be<br />

zoomorphic with a ring-and-dot motif suggesting an 'eye'.<br />

Opposite the ends of the connecting plates are additional<br />

groups of three ring-and-dot motifs.<br />

1860 Fig 59 SF BUC 1705, H1024 G685. Grave fill. Period 2.<br />

Fragments of a decayed comb. Length (incomplete)<br />

66.0mm, width at the surviving end 46.0mm. <strong>The</strong><br />

connecting plates are broad, 19.0mm across, and patterned<br />

with lengthwise grooves and double-ring-and-dot<br />

decoration. <strong>The</strong> surviving end may be zoomorphic and has<br />

pairs of double-ring-and-dot motifs.<br />

Patricia Galloway has kindly supplied the following<br />

comments on the combs: Parallels for most of these<br />

combs may be sought from late 4th-century<br />

cemeteries in Britain (Lankhills, Poundbury) and on<br />

the Continent (Künzing), but no comb in the present<br />

group has an exact and complete parallel from<br />

another site. <strong>The</strong> proportions and the spirit of<br />

decoration in this group, however, are clearly in line<br />

with the examples from similar sites.<br />

Precise parallels can be sought for individual<br />

decorative elements. <strong>The</strong> stepped connecting plate<br />

found on combs 1851, 1856, and 1857 isa relatively<br />

common stylistic device which appears in multiple<br />

examples from the sites mentioned above, although<br />

the incised motifs on 1851 and 1856 have no exact<br />

parallel on a comb. <strong>The</strong> unusual vertical moulding on<br />

1857 is echoed by vertical incised lines on a<br />

connecting plate from Künzing, while the horizontal<br />

row of double-ring-and-dot motifs on 1860 is a<br />

decorative theme found also at Künzing and Trier. <strong>The</strong><br />

shaping of the 1860 connecting plate and the one on<br />

comb 1854 may represent simply a deepening of the<br />

very common horizontal grooves found on many<br />

combs from late <strong>Roman</strong> sites. Even the broad flat<br />

connecting plate of 1855 is not without parallel, this<br />

time from Lankhills and Poundbury.<br />

<strong>The</strong> combs from Butt Road are badly preserved, so<br />

that in no case are the end tooth segments intact<br />

enough to establish their shapes with certainty, but it<br />

is quite evident in most cases that these end<br />

segments were decoratively shaped. Such decorative<br />

shaping is a part of the definition of the late <strong>Roman</strong><br />

provincial double-sided type; it might almost be said<br />

that uniqueness in this shaping is part of the type<br />

definition, so that where shaping is obvious, as on<br />

1855, 1857 and 1860, we do not expect it to<br />

conform to any one pattern. Decoration of the end<br />

segments with ring-and-dot ornament is also<br />

characteristic. All of the attributes cited, in fact,<br />

confirm the membership of most of these combs in<br />

this type classification.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is one exception. Comb 1853 is clearly, even<br />

from superficial observation, not a comfortable<br />

member of the group. Its narrow convex connecting<br />

plate and its carelessly-applied iron rivets suggest<br />

possible local manufacture, although at least one<br />

57<br />

example, far more skilfully made and decorated, was<br />

found in the Trier Kaiserthermen. <strong>The</strong> comb is,<br />

however, so badly preserved that it is impossible to<br />

judge its origin with much confidence except to say<br />

that it was not the same as that of the others and<br />

might conceivably fall into a later period.<br />

STIRRING RODS (Fig 60; 1861-1864)<br />

Glass rods (Isings 1957, form 79) were used to stir<br />

perfumes and cosmetics stored in <strong>small</strong> glass flasks,<br />

aryballoi or unguentaria. Thin oil-based cosmetics<br />

and perfumes separate and need to be re-emulsified<br />

before use, while thicker ones may dry out and<br />

require softening with extra oil at intervals. Stirring<br />

rods may date only to the 1st and 2nd centuries (ibid),<br />

but seem to be found throughout the <strong>Roman</strong> period<br />

(Charlesworth 1972, 215). Four rod fragments are<br />

catalogued here. All are of translucent glass drawn<br />

out in a tight spiral. Two are green, each with a<br />

distinct air hole visible as a dark thread in the glass,<br />

and two are bluey-green, each with two narrower air<br />

holes. <strong>The</strong> two bluey-green fragments are 1.0mm<br />

thicker than the green examples. <strong>The</strong>se similarities<br />

may be coincidence.<br />

1861 Fig 60 SF BKC 2224, G126. Uncertain. Period 3? Length<br />

28.0mm, diameter 7.0mm. Corroding translucent blueygreen<br />

glass.<br />

1862 Fig 60 SF BKC 4611, T213 F95. Slot? Period 3. Length<br />

19.0mm, diameter 6.0mm. Translucent green glass.<br />

Fig 60 Stirring rod fragments (1:1)<br />

MIXING PALETTES (Fig 61; 1865-1868)<br />

Small slabs of stone were used as palettes on which<br />

to mix cosmetics or medicines (Milne 1970, 171).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se palettes have bevelled edges, and were<br />

probably kept with the more decorative bevelled side<br />

up. This is suggested by our illustrated examples<br />

where it is the undersurface that has been worn by<br />

the action of mixing. Palettes have been found with<br />

edges worn by the sharpening of scalpels (ibid).<br />

1865 Fig 61 SF LWC 732, B F70. Probably cellar backfill. Period 5.<br />

Onyx marble. Length (incomplete) 81.0mm, width<br />

(incomplete) 59.5 mm.<br />

1867 Fig 61 SF BKC 4883, T17 L5. Destruction debris of Period 3.<br />

Period 3 (end). Greenstone. Length (incomplete) 59.5 mm,<br />

width 58.0mm. This palette is very worn on the underside,<br />

and also shows signs that some mixing has been done on<br />

the upper surface.<br />

NAIL-CLEANERS<br />

Despite the low number of nail-cleaners recovered, it<br />

has been possible to suggest a rough typology for<br />

these objects. Types 1 to 3 are cast, Type 4 is beaten<br />

out. All are of copper alloy.<br />

Type 1 a (Fig 62; 1869-1870). A simple type with a<br />

more or less straight flat, thickish shaft. <strong>The</strong><br />

suspension loop rises directly from the shaft, and is<br />

on the same plane. A mid to late 1st-century type,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!