28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

undertaken (by Buckley and Major) shows that many<br />

Essex <strong>Roman</strong> settlements have produced lava<br />

querns. It is quite likely that many of these were<br />

marketed through <strong>Colchester</strong> as an established part<br />

of civil trade, but at this time it is not possible to<br />

comment on how this may have affected existing<br />

trade in native puddingstone querns or how long this<br />

lava quern trade persisted. Peacock (1980, 50)<br />

considers that it was most common in the 1st and 2nd<br />

centuries, as only three examples have been securely<br />

dated to the later <strong>Roman</strong> period. <strong>The</strong> extent to which<br />

the <strong>Colchester</strong> lava querns from 2nd- to 4th-century<br />

contexts represent a continuation of this trade into<br />

the later <strong>Roman</strong> period rather than just residual<br />

fragments reused or incorporated into later contexts<br />

will only be resolved by further study.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two puddingstone querns fall within the upper<br />

diameter range for these stones, but otherwise are of<br />

standard bun-shaped form with slightly concave<br />

grinding surface to the upper stone and a narrow<br />

hopper. Rather than a horizontal handle slot cut into<br />

the upper stone both stones have a band above the<br />

rim to hold an iron hoop with a projecting horizontal<br />

handle. 2<br />

A provisional gazetteer of Hertfordshire<br />

conglomerate or puddingstone querns has been<br />

published (Rudge 1968) showing a distribution<br />

principally confined to Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex.<br />

Although central to this distribution area, Rudge<br />

observed that the <strong>Colchester</strong> district was notably<br />

lacking in puddingstone quern <strong>finds</strong>. This appears to<br />

be borne out by their scarcity from recent excavations<br />

in the town. It could reflect the dependence of <strong>Roman</strong><br />

<strong>Colchester</strong> from the beginning on imported lava<br />

Fig 79 Stone mortars and a fragment from a stone vessel (1:3)<br />

76<br />

querns. Curwen considered the puddingstone quern<br />

to be derived, at least in part, from the pre-<strong>Roman</strong><br />

Hunsbury type quern although where datable<br />

associations are available they have always been<br />

<strong>Roman</strong> (Curwen 1941,20). Rudge (1963,28) believed<br />

that there was strong evidence that production had<br />

ceased within 100 years of the start of the <strong>Roman</strong><br />

occupation. However, well stratified puddingstone<br />

querns are rare which makes 2075 (Fig 78), securely<br />

dated to Period 2 predating the destruction of 60/1,<br />

particularly useful as an early form. Even though<br />

puddingstone querns are of a fairly standard form<br />

variations do exist. Whether this is a chronological<br />

variation or whether it represents the products of<br />

different workshops, rather than of a single firm as<br />

postulated by Curwen (1941, 20), may only be<br />

established as a typology based upon stratified<br />

examples is compiled. •<br />

Stone mortars (Fig 79; 2082-2085)<br />

2082 Fig 79 SF LWC 3300, J970. Building debris. Period 2<br />

demolition. Carrara marble. Fragment of the rim with a<br />

grooved pouring lug. <strong>The</strong> vessel was dished. Internal<br />

diameter at the rim 169.0mm.<br />

2083 Fig 79 SF BKC 5323, N637. Period 6 or later. Stone<br />

unidentified. A complete profile from a straight-walled<br />

?mortarium. No lugs survive. Rim diameter ?340.0mm.<br />

2084 Fig 79 SF BKC 5320, T76 F25. Construction trench of cellar.<br />

Period 5c. Purbeck marble. Fragment of the rim with a plain<br />

lug. Dished. Internal diameter at the rim 148.0mm.<br />

2085 Fig 79 SF IRD 1. Unstratified. Stone unidentified. Large<br />

fragment with complete profile from a dished mortarium<br />

with a grooved pouring lug. Internal diameter at the rim<br />

192.0mm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!