28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CATEGORY 9: BUILDINGS AND SERVICES<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>finds</strong> belonging to this category will be dealt with<br />

in more detail in the site reports since, as for example<br />

with fragments of architectural stone, these are best<br />

seen in the light of the structure with which they are<br />

associated. Catalogue numbers have been allocated<br />

to these pieces and brief descriptions are given in<br />

note form on microfiche.<br />

CATEGORY 10: TOOLS<br />

TOOL HANDLES<br />

Most of the catalogued handles probably come from<br />

knives. Some may be from razors (2938-9). All but<br />

two of the handles are of bone or antler. <strong>The</strong> bones<br />

used in most cases can be identified as long bones.<br />

<strong>The</strong> handles are illustrated with the blade end<br />

downwards.<br />

Three methods of attaching a handle to the tang of a<br />

knife or tool are distinguishable. First, riveting which<br />

was used on two-piece handles (Fig 111, 2933).<br />

Second, driving the tang into the marrow-cavity of the<br />

bone, which was usually packed with wood-<br />

shavings 1<br />

, so that the irregularities of cancellous<br />

tissue and the wood-shavings prevented the tang<br />

from twisting or slipping out (often a collar was also<br />

used with this method). Third, fixing the tang in<br />

tension against the handle by means of an iron clip.<br />

<strong>The</strong> handle types on which this last method was used<br />

are the subject of a paper by Stephen Greep<br />

(forthcoming a). This paper illustrates not only<br />

complete extant examples, but also a relief (CIL 6,<br />

16166) on which several forms of handle and blade<br />

are shown, including pieces with tension clip fittings.<br />

This method of attachment is described below under<br />

one-piece waisted handles.<br />

BONE AND ANTLER HANDLES<br />

One-piece handles<br />

a) plain (Fig 110; 2915-2920). Handles similar to<br />

these are found throughout the <strong>Roman</strong> period.<br />

2915 Fig 110 SF LWC 895(C), A292. Period 3b. A polished and<br />

only slightly worked metapodial. One articulated end has<br />

been sawn off, the other has been sawn through to provide a<br />

thickened grip. <strong>The</strong>re is green staining from association with<br />

corroding copper alloy at the narrow end, probably from a<br />

collar. Length 82.5mm, maximum diameter 13.5 mm.<br />

2916 Fig 110 SF LWC 4208, J571. Floor level Period 4. A roughly-<br />

107<br />

Wall veneer and other architectural stonef ragments<br />

(except tesserae): 2546-2821.<br />

Tesserae (other than of tile) not directly associated<br />

with a mosaic: 2822-2866.<br />

Water-pipe junction collars and associated <strong>finds</strong>:<br />

2867-2914.<br />

made handle of red deer antler, slightly curved, with the<br />

outer surface trimmed. A fragment of an iron tang is visible<br />

in the narrow end of the handle. It does not pierce through to<br />

the broad end. Length 56.0mm, maximum diameter<br />

22.5mm.<br />

b) with a waisted end. <strong>The</strong>se handles appear to be<br />

Claudian-Neronian in date, though they may survive<br />

into the early. Flavian period. In Britain their<br />

distribution covers the area of early military<br />

occupation and civilian settlement. While they clearly<br />

arrived in Britain with the <strong>Roman</strong> army, there is no<br />

good reason to suppose that they were specifically<br />

military. <strong>The</strong> relief depicting knives with these<br />

handles in a cutler's shop (ibid) indicates rather that<br />

they had civilian uses. Moreover, the great range in<br />

size of the handles suggests that they were fitted onto<br />

blades of widely varying size and function. 2<br />

<strong>The</strong>se handles were attached to the tang of the knife<br />

blade by a complex method involving the use of a<br />

tension clip. While none of the <strong>Colchester</strong> examples<br />

has a surviving clip, Stephen Greep's work on the<br />

handle types enables the method to be described. At<br />

each end of the handle a groove was cut across the<br />

transverse section (both slots were parallel). <strong>The</strong> top<br />

of the blade slotted into the groove at the lower end,<br />

and an iron strip of rectangular section fitted into the<br />

upper groove. <strong>The</strong> tang, which rose from the centre of<br />

the blade, extended up the handle to pass through a<br />

hole in the iron strip in the upper groove. <strong>The</strong> end of<br />

the tang was hammered flat to hold both blade and<br />

strip in position. To hold the blade firmly to the handle,<br />

and to stop any lateral movement of the tang, the end<br />

of the handle was waisted and the ends of the strip<br />

coiled into spirals and positioned in this waist so that<br />

the hammered end of the tang was pushed outwards<br />

against the end of the handle. <strong>The</strong> strip thus acted as<br />

a tension clip rather than simply as a washer, and<br />

was, in addition, decorative. That this method of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!