28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2066 SF BKC 1940, El 181 (F158). Collapse. Periods 2-4. Lava,<br />

two joining lower-stone fragments, maximum thickness<br />

60.0mm. Grinding surface has bi-directional grooving, not<br />

very worn.<br />

2067 SF BKC 5815, J151 L1. Site clearance. Lava, upper-stone<br />

fragment, -/35.0 mm. Faint traces of bi-directional grooving<br />

on the upper surface and radial grooving on the grinding<br />

surface.<br />

2068 SF BKC 5820, K73 L4. Modern. Lava, upper-stone fragment.<br />

Sub-radial grooving on the grinding surface, top surface flat.<br />

2069 SF BKC 5814, N277 F87. Pit. Period 6+. Lava, fragment. One<br />

pecked surface.<br />

2070 SF BKC 5819, T496. Period 1 (and 2a). Lava, two joining and<br />

one other upper-stone fragments, -/50.0 mm. Traces of bidirectional<br />

grooving on the grinding surface and a very<br />

eroded raised lip on the upper edge, tapering towards the<br />

middle.<br />

2071 Fig 78 SF BKC 5813, V71. Unstratified. Puddingstone,<br />

upper-stone fragment. Diameter 354.0mm, centre<br />

thickness 105.0mm. Grinding surface slightly concave,<br />

band (probably for an iron hoop) above the rim, and possible<br />

trace of a handle hole.<br />

2072 SF BKC 6063, V71. Unstratified. Lava, ?upper-stone<br />

fragment, 400.0/80.0mm. Traces of grooving on one<br />

surface and vertical grooving on the edge.<br />

2073 SF BKC 5816, V701. Unstratified. Lava, three fragments.<br />

Two joining pieces are probably reworked, maximum<br />

thickness 90.0mm. <strong>The</strong> third piece is very eroded with a<br />

trace of a kerb, maximum thickness 45.0mm.<br />

2074 Fig 78 SF BKC 5823, V701. Unstratified. Lava, lower-stone,<br />

-/104.0 mm/-. Very thick. No trace of grooving, rough<br />

undersurface and an hour-glass-shaped hole.<br />

2075 Fig 78 SF BKC 6055, V772 L93. Charcoal and daub. Period 2.<br />

Puddingstone upper-stone fragment. Diameter about<br />

350.0mm, centre thickness 110.0mm. Band above the rim<br />

(see 2071).<br />

2076 Fig 78 SF BKC 6038, V1029 L94. Sand floor. Period 4 or<br />

earlier. Lava, upper-stone fragment, -/110.0mm. Grinding<br />

surface smooth, sub-radial grooving on the top surface,<br />

vertical grooving on the edge, and raised lip on the upper<br />

edge.<br />

2077 SF BKC 5822, V1262. Unstratified. Periods 2 to 6? Lava, two<br />

fragments: a) ?lower-stone, maximum thickness 100.0mm.<br />

Appears to have been squared off for re-use; b) ?upperstone,<br />

maximum thickness 100.0mm.<br />

2078 SF BKC 6037, V1290 L163. Make-up. Period 2 or 3. Lava,<br />

upper-stone fragment, -/70.0mm. Remains of a hopper<br />

hole of about 80.0mm diameter, smooth grinding surface,<br />

bi-directional tooling on the top surface.<br />

2079 SF BUC 1 592, H456 L8. Period 2. Lava, possibly a fragment<br />

of reused quernstone.<br />

2080 SF BUC 1617, H617 L20. Period 2. Lava, upper-stone<br />

fragment, maximum thickness 32.0mm. Grooved on both<br />

faces.<br />

2081 SF BUC 1715, H714 L30. Period 2. Lava, two non-joining<br />

quern fragments: a) maximum thickness 23.0mm, grinding<br />

surface smooth; b) maximum thickness 25.0mm, grinding<br />

surface has traces of grooving.<br />

<strong>The</strong> typology, distribution, and economic and social<br />

implications of British querns have attracted little<br />

detailed study since the pioneer articles of Curwen<br />

(1937; 1941). This arises in part from a lack of<br />

adequate information. Although museums contain<br />

large numbers of querns the majority are<br />

unprovenanced, excavated examples rarely come<br />

from well stratified contexts, while poor recording<br />

and publication hampers interpretation. <strong>The</strong> querns<br />

from three <strong>Colchester</strong> sites reported here afford little<br />

opportunity for testing the validity of accepted<br />

theories about querns but they are a useful addition to<br />

the corpus of published information.<br />

75<br />

With the exception of two puddingstone querns all<br />

the stones are lava rotary querns. <strong>The</strong> majority of lava<br />

mills in Britain is generally believed to be from the<br />

Mayen quarries of the Eifel Hills of Germany (for the<br />

background to these quarries see Hörter et al 1951;<br />

Crawford and Röder 1955; Röder 1972) although the<br />

possibility of a trade in querns of Volvic lava from the<br />

Auvergne region of France has also been discussed<br />

(Röder 1953; Peacock 1980). <strong>The</strong> Mayen quarries<br />

have a long history beginning with the production and<br />

trading of saddle-querns during the Neolithic period,<br />

changing to circular rotary querns during the late La<br />

Tène period. During the <strong>Roman</strong> period there was a<br />

considerable trade with Britain and other provinces.<br />

This trade apparently ceased with the early Anglo-<br />

Saxon period, but was well established again by the<br />

middle to late Anglo-Saxon period (Parkhouse 1977)<br />

and continued throughout the Middle Ages.<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority of fragments of lava querns are too <strong>small</strong><br />

to provide sufficient data for a meaningful discussion<br />

of size and type. Collectively the querns from early<br />

and later <strong>Roman</strong> contexts conform to <strong>Roman</strong> forms as<br />

illustrated by Röder (Crawford and Röder 1955, fig 1,<br />

4, 5, 6). Lower stones are concave below and convex<br />

and smoother above; upper stones are concave below<br />

and flat above with a raised rim around the edge to<br />

hold back the grains of corn. Apart from the<br />

underneath of the lower stone, surfaces are usually<br />

grooved, although a number have smooth grinding<br />

surfaces. <strong>The</strong>se may never have been grooved or<br />

have lost the grooves through wear. <strong>The</strong> striations on<br />

the grinding surface were functional, but decorative<br />

grooving also occurs on the top of the upper stone and<br />

vertically around the edges of both upper and lower<br />

stones. Few upper fragments retain any trace of the<br />

hopper or handle socket with the exception of 2057<br />

(Fig 78) which has a handle hole through the kerb<br />

comparable to Röder's Type 4 (ibid, fig 1). Röder<br />

claimed this as a feature of an oscillating rather than<br />

totally rotating form, but following experiments this<br />

has been disputed (Brown and Chapman<br />

forthcoming).<br />

A case has been made (ibid) for a regular trade,<br />

perhaps centred on London, of two basic models of<br />

lava quern, identifiable by diameter and method of<br />

fixing the rynd, which were imported in an unfinished<br />

state to be dressed and finished in workshops in this<br />

country. It has also been suggested (Mcllwain 1980,<br />

132) that the presence of lava querns on many<br />

military sites raises the possibility that they were<br />

brought to this country specifically for, or by, the<br />

army. <strong>The</strong> predominance of lava querns from <strong>Roman</strong><br />

<strong>Colchester</strong>, particularly over Hertfordshire<br />

puddingstone querns which have come from so many<br />

<strong>Roman</strong> sites throughout East Anglia, can be<br />

interpreted as a reflection of the extent to which<br />

<strong>Colchester</strong> must have shared in this continental<br />

trade. That this trade started early, possibly as a result<br />

of <strong>Colchester</strong>'s military connections, is indicated by a<br />

number of quern fragments from Period 1 and 2<br />

contexts including 2062 from a military context and<br />

2070 from a pre-Boudican layer. Research being

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!