28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig 42 Plain copper-alloy armlets (1:1)<br />

1656 Fig 43 SF BUC 605(C), C1215 G378. Grave deposit. Period 2.<br />

Internal diameter oval, 46.0 by 50.0mm; rectangular<br />

section, thickness 1.0mm, height 3.0mm. Twisted<br />

expanding clasp. <strong>The</strong>re are faint alternating notches on the<br />

upper and lower edges.<br />

b) obliquely toothed (Kenyon 1948, fig 83, 2)<br />

1657 Fig 43 SF BUC 38(C), A223 G16. Grave deposit. Period 2.<br />

Internal diameter 40.5 mm; rectangular section, thickness<br />

2.0mm, height 1.0mm. <strong>The</strong>re is no obvious join on the<br />

armlet. A penannular suspension ring, which probably<br />

originally held an ornament (as Fig 41, 1610), is threaded<br />

onto the armlet.<br />

c) crenellated, with toothing between the<br />

crenellations (ibid, fig 83, 3)<br />

1659 Fig 43 SF BUC 388/9(C), B1050 G171. Grave deposit.<br />

Period 2. Internal diameter 59.0mm; rectangular section,<br />

thickness 3.0mm, height 2.0mm. One of a group of similar<br />

armlets (1658-64), six with complete diameters (two in<br />

fragments), and part of a seventh. All have lap joints fixed by<br />

a single copper-alloy rivet. <strong>The</strong> depth of the crenellations<br />

varies. On 1663 they have almost worn away, whereas on<br />

1660 they show no sign of wear.<br />

Transverse grooves (Fig 44; 1672-1692)<br />

a) continuous<br />

1676 Fig 44 SF BUC 388/9(C), B1050 G171. Grave deposit.<br />

Period 2. One of a pair with 1677. Internal diameter<br />

55.0mm; D-shaped section, thickness 1.5mm, height<br />

3.0mm. <strong>The</strong> deep transverse grooves give a ridged effect.<br />

<strong>The</strong> armlet has a lap joint, probably originally soldered, now<br />

sprung apart.<br />

1679 Fig 44 SF BUC 388/9(C), B1050 G171. Grave deposit.<br />

Period 2. One of a pair with 1678. In fragments, internal<br />

40<br />

diameter 53.0mm; rectangular section, thickness 1.0mm,<br />

height 4.0mm. <strong>The</strong> decoration is slight transverse scoring<br />

between marginal grooves. Fixed by a lap joint, probably<br />

originally soldered, now sprung apart.<br />

b) in groups<br />

1683 Fig 44 SF BKC 2788(C), H298 (F94 + F167). Pits. Period 6.<br />

Distorted. Internal diameter 41.0mm; D-shaped section,<br />

thickness 1.5mm, height 3.0mm. Penannular. At each<br />

terminal a group of transverse grooves is followed by a plain<br />

panel and two transverse grooves. A similar armlet was<br />

found at Shakenoak, Oxfordshire (Brodribb et al 1971 b, fig<br />

48, 75).<br />

1684 Fig 44 SF BKC 5467(C), V701. Unstratified. Distorted.<br />

Internal diameter 30.0mm; D-shaped section, thickness<br />

1.5 mm, height 3.5 mm. Penannular. Only one terminal<br />

survives. This shows similar decoration to that of 1688, but<br />

the panel between the groups of transverse grooves bears<br />

an incised elongated cross. <strong>The</strong> other end has been either<br />

broken or deliberately cut.<br />

1687 Fig 44 SF CPS 601(C), 576 F115. Occupation. Period 4.<br />

Fragment, with groups of grooves alternating with panels<br />

containing a single ring-and-dot. D-shaped section,<br />

thickness 3.0mm, height 4.0mm. A parallel for this<br />

fragment was found in a hoard of armlets at Richborough,<br />

Kent (Henderson 1949, pl 49, 9) dated post 275-300.<br />

1688 Fig 44 SF BUC 69(C), A356 G24. Grave deposit. Period 2.<br />

Internal diameter 28.0mm; D-shaped section, thickness<br />

2.0mm, height 3.0mm. Groups of slight transverse grooves<br />

alternate with short thick plain panels which may have been<br />

plated with white metal. <strong>The</strong> armlet was probably made from<br />

a larger one, as one end appears to have been cut. <strong>The</strong> upper<br />

half of the other end forms a tongue.<br />

1689 Fig 44 SF BUC 388/9(C), B1050 G171. Grave deposit.<br />

Period 2. In two fragments, internal diameter 52.5 mm;<br />

rectangular section, thickness 1.5 mm, height 3.5 mm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!