28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CATEGORY 13: MILITARY EQUIPMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> military equipment has been divided into four<br />

main groups. <strong>The</strong>y are a) equipment from contexts<br />

dated c 43 to 60/1, b) 1st-century equipment from<br />

contexts dated later than 60/1, c) equipment of the<br />

2nd or 3rd century, and d) late <strong>Roman</strong> belt-fittings<br />

probably from the cingulum militare. Seven pieces<br />

from the first group and one from the second have<br />

previously been illustrated (Crummy 1977, fig 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are fully catalogued here with their illustrations.<br />

Most of the last group has already been published<br />

with specialist reports and comments in CAR 1, and<br />

consequently for those pieces only brief descriptions<br />

and references will be given here. Also included in<br />

this category are phallic amulets usually associated<br />

with the <strong>Roman</strong> army.<br />

<strong>The</strong> total number of pieces of 1st-century military<br />

equipment recovered between 1971 and 1979 is far<br />

too <strong>small</strong> to be able to postulate anything about<br />

proportions of legionaries to auxiliaries, or of infantry<br />

to cavalry, during the military occupation. Such an<br />

attempt would in any case probably be of little value,<br />

as the body armour issued to auxiliary infantry is far<br />

from certain, and that worn by auxiliary cavalry also<br />

probably varied (Frere and St Joseph 1974, 39-40).<br />

Moreover, any effort to clarify the fortress map in<br />

terms of the disposition of troops would have to be<br />

based on what at present is a very limited number of<br />

objects found specifically in fortress contexts since<br />

equipment from contexts dated after c 49 could as<br />

likely derive from the retired veterans of the colony or<br />

visiting troops as be residual <strong>finds</strong> from the<br />

occupation of the fortress. Only thirteen pieces of<br />

equipment usually dated to the 2nd and/or 3rd<br />

centuries have been recovered. At least one piece<br />

(the fragment of scale armour, Fig 161, 4246) may<br />

possibly belong with the 1st-century equipment.<br />

EQUIPMENT FROM CONTEXTS DATED<br />

43 TO 60/1<br />

ARMOUR<br />

Belt and apron fittings of copper alloy (except for<br />

4176, which is bone) (Fig 144; 4173-4181). Many<br />

of these fittings, in particular the apron mounts,<br />

would have been tinned or silvered, and would have<br />

had niello or enamel set in the recessed areas. Traces<br />

of this decoration are often no longer detectable, but<br />

in many cases where a flower or leaf pattern is<br />

mentioned (eg 4174) it may be assumed that the<br />

piece was so embellished.<br />

4173 Fig 144 SF LWC 3715(C), A379 F101. Rampart. Period 1. A<br />

D-shaped buckle. Both the hinge end of the tongue and the<br />

ends of the loop are decorated with transverse mouldings<br />

<strong>The</strong> triangular section tongue is 2.0mm thick. Maximum<br />

129<br />

Fig 144 Military belt and apron fittings from contexts dated 43 to<br />

60/1 (1:1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!