Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
graves in the Butt Road cemeteries were planned in<br />
situ. Some are illustrated in Fig 56. <strong>The</strong> soil<br />
conditions on the site were acid, so no leather<br />
survived except as a dark stain from which the<br />
approximate shapes of the shoes could be planned.<br />
<strong>The</strong> nails themselves were very corroded. In many<br />
cases distortion of the nail pattern caused by the<br />
disturbance of the body within the coffin on<br />
deposition and by soil movement on the collapse of<br />
the coffin, coupled with the unfavourable soil<br />
conditions, meant that only a jumble of a few nails<br />
survived to indicate the presence of footwear.<br />
<strong>The</strong> type of shoe deposited is unknown. Probably both<br />
the calceus, a shoe, often of openwork, and the solea,<br />
a thonged sandal (Charlesworth and Thornton 1973,<br />
150; Keppie 1975, 66, 68), were represented. It may<br />
be that soles set with hobnails in a simple pattern<br />
were from sandals, and those studded heavily were<br />
shoes. <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence to suggest that the<br />
military boot, the caliga, may also be represented<br />
(Clarke 1979, 322; Keppie 1975, 78).<br />
Notes<br />
1 <strong>The</strong> prefix AD has been omitted from dates except where<br />
confusion may arise.<br />
2 Pre-<strong>Roman</strong> features have, however, been found during the<br />
Culver Street excavation of 1981-2.<br />
3 This brooch, with six others, was found in a box in the<br />
<strong>Colchester</strong> and Essex Museum with a label stating that they had<br />
been given by Mr Round. This probably refers to Dr J H Round,<br />
the eminent <strong>Colchester</strong> historian, who died in 1928.<br />
4 In late Iron Age contexts only three are known to me. two from<br />
Prae Wood, Herts, Iron Age occupation period, AD 5-35, both<br />
flat sectioned, one with incised zig-zag on top, the other with<br />
transverse incisions near coil (Wheeler and Wheeler 1936, fig<br />
24, 3 and 4); and one from Camulodunum, <strong>Colchester</strong>,<br />
Sheepen T.H.7, 80-90 ft at 18 ins, flat sectioned with two<br />
grooves on upper face, transverse hatchings across these<br />
(Hawkes and Hull 1947, fig 59, 4, no 186, CM 35.10.<br />
From undated or unlocated contexts, some of which might be<br />
1st or 2nd century but some of which might well be late<br />
<strong>Roman</strong>o-British\or Anglo-Saxon, there are: <strong>Colchester</strong>, Essex,<br />
one with round sectioned hoop, segmented mouldings on upper<br />
half (Jarmin Coll., CM 246.02); half only of a minute brooch with<br />
tiny zig-zag impressed into flat upper face (Joslin Coll., CM<br />
1051); St Albans or Verulamium, Herts, two flat sectioned<br />
brooches with notched chevrons on edge (Herts County<br />
Museum); Woodeaton, Oxon, round sectioned, groove on coils<br />
(Ashmolean, Pr 421); Dragonby Moneyfield, Scunthorpe,<br />
Lines, flat sectioned, with engraved transverse hatchings on<br />
hoop, coil and pin head, which is humped and spoon-ended<br />
(Scunthorpe Museum); Honington, Suffolk, flat sectioned,<br />
engraved opposed 'V's on hoop (Ashmolean, 1927, 6326);<br />
Icklingham, Suffolk, one, rolled strip, flattened, engraved<br />
triangles like snake's skin (Ashmolean, 1927, 6386) and<br />
another one, flat sectioned, engraved transverse hatchings<br />
(Ashmolean, 1927, 6329); Ixworth, Suffolk, flat sectioned with<br />
engraved 'S's across ring, (Museum of Archaeology and<br />
Ethnography, Cambridge, A.1910.150).<br />
From late <strong>Roman</strong>o-British contexts: Lydney, Glos, one flat<br />
sectioned, 'V's nicked on outside edge of hoop, another round<br />
sectioned, has coils only engraved like the Woodeaton example.<br />
Most of the Lydney penannular brooches are Type Ds and many<br />
are decorated with transverse hatchings, 'V's nicked on outside<br />
and inside of hoop, or have opposed triangles or figures-of-eight<br />
across hoop. All these forms of decoration figure on other types<br />
of penannular brooches which, where datable, are late rather<br />
than early <strong>Roman</strong>o-British (Wheeler and Wheeler 1932).<br />
From Anglo-Saxon contexts, some graves (all are flat<br />
sectioned): Sleaford, Lines, one with grooved coils (BM 834-<br />
53<br />
?PURSE (Fig 57; 1850)<br />
1850 Fig 57 SF BUC 693(C), C392 G278. Grave deposit. Period 1.<br />
A large mass of iron pan containing objects Fig 58, 1802-5<br />
and 1811, two pierced coins (Julia Maesa, 218-223, and<br />
Claudius I copy, 43-64) and many copper-alloy chain links.<br />
Three types of link were present. Thick(1.5 mm) penannular<br />
links (Fig 57, a), thin (1.0mm) solid links (Fig 57, b), and thin<br />
(1.0mm) penannular links with flattened and pierced<br />
terminals fixed by a rivet (Fig 57, c, d). <strong>The</strong> thick penannular<br />
links appear to predominate. No patterns of interlinking<br />
could be distinguished. Though the majority of surviving<br />
fragments are of interlinked thick penannular rings (Fig 57,<br />
e), at least one example can be found of each type joined to<br />
each other type. <strong>The</strong> most likely interpretation of these links<br />
is that they formed a purse. <strong>The</strong> interlinking and the narrow<br />
holes and suspension loops of the objects associated with<br />
the links rule out the possibility of a simple neck chain.<br />
Fig 57 Links from a ?chain mesh purse (1:1)<br />
1.52); Faversham, Kent, with a shallow groove round hoop(BM<br />
1175.70); two from Nassington, Northants, with sideways 'S's<br />
(Antiq J 24 (1944), pl 23, c.A); Fimber, Yorks, with zig-zags<br />
(Mortimer 1905, 190-2).<br />
5 At <strong>Colchester</strong> the average diameter of bone pin shafts is<br />
4.1 mm. <strong>The</strong> average width or diameter of bone needle heads is<br />
4.7 mm and of bronze needle heads 3.2mm.<br />
6 Grave 115, silver pin Fig 28, 480; Grave 174, silver pin 481;<br />
Grave 342, silver pin Fig 31, 512; Grave 519, two copper-alloy<br />
pins 488 and 489; Grave 537, copper-alloy pin Fig 28, 484,<br />
silver pin 483, silver pin with gilt copper-alloy head 482, and<br />
, four glass pins 462, 464, Fig 25, 461, 463. Grave groups and<br />
the positions of these objects relative to the skulls concerned<br />
will be published in the forthcoming site report.<br />
7 Grave 687, Type 3 bone pin 340.<br />
8 See also Hagen 1937, 95-7.<br />
9 Stephen Greep has noted evidence for the use of a lathe on pi ns<br />
of Type 6 in the north of England (pers comm).<br />
10 A Type 2 pin from the Culver Street site, 1981.<br />
11 An attempt was made to dye an unstratified metapodial using<br />
green food colouring. After immersion for a week in a solution<br />
of one part colouring to ten parts water the bone was externally<br />
green. It was then split using a hammer. Internally the<br />
cancellous tissue was much greener than the bone wall, which<br />
had only been penetrated by the colouring for a depth of 1.0mm.<br />
12 I am very grateful to Stephen Greep for information about the<br />
relative percentages of this type. <strong>The</strong>se figures are, however,<br />
provisional.<br />
13 For information on the properties attributed by the ancients to<br />
jet, its sources, and the etymology of the word see Hagen 1937,<br />
77-8; RCHM 1962, 141.<br />
14 <strong>The</strong> lumps of a black vitreous substance mentioned by Hull<br />
(1958, 158b) may have been melted jet.<br />
15 Other examples are published in Neal 1977, fig 46,23; Neal and<br />
Butcher 1974, fig 64, 212; Cunliffe 1971, fig 52, 172; and<br />
Bushe-Fox 1928, pl 19, 26.<br />
16 See Brodribb et al 1971 a, fig 30, 32; Cunliffe 1971, fig 52,171;<br />
Henderson I949, pl 53,197,198; and Kenyon 1948, fig 89,2,3.<br />
17 <strong>The</strong> reference in Lawson 1976 (247 note 2) to the use of hairrings<br />
having been observed at Strood, Kent (Coll Ant 1848) is<br />
spurious.<br />
18 I am grateful to David Birkett for this information.<br />
19 <strong>The</strong> human wrist and arm are, after all, more or less oval in<br />
section.<br />
20 <strong>The</strong> bones are very decayed and the skeleton cannot therefore<br />
be sexed.