Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Unclassified (Fig 14; 88-92)<br />
88 Fig 14 SF LWC 3175(C), J947. Make-up or dump. Period 4.<br />
Length 42.0mm. A 'racquet'-shaped brooch with five<br />
circular lugs round the head and a sixth on the handle. Three<br />
of the lugs contain traces of white enamel. <strong>The</strong> pit in the<br />
centre of each lug may have contained a dot of contrasting<br />
enamel or copper-alloy. One of the lugs on a similar, though<br />
more heavily enamelled, brooch from Cramond, Lothian<br />
contained white enamel with 'a central brownish dot'<br />
(Maxwell 1974, 193). <strong>The</strong> date of the Cramond brooch is<br />
probably Antonine, which compares well with the context of<br />
this example. Another slightly similar brooch from<br />
Woodyates, Dorset is undated (Corp 4348).<br />
89 Fig 14 SF BKC 2473(C), G428 Surface cleaning. Period 5c.<br />
Length 37.5mm. A lozenge-shaped brooch with mosaic<br />
enamelling, possibly related to Type 226 (see 78 above).<br />
Within the copper-alloy rim there is a frame of red enamel<br />
around a design of nine rectangles of millefiori. <strong>The</strong> four<br />
blocks at each corner show a dark blue and white<br />
chessboard surrounded by a pale blue frame; the four<br />
between these, set in the manner of a St Andrew's cross, are<br />
of white enamel with two dark blue streaks running towards<br />
the centre. Enough of the middle block survives to show a<br />
yellow rectangle with black radiating spokes around a<br />
central red spot. <strong>The</strong> pin is missing. This brooch probably<br />
belongs to the 2nd-century floruit of enamelled brooches.<br />
90 Fig 14 SF BKC 2983(C), J36 L4. Dump. Period 5b. Length<br />
28.0mm. Two fragments of a <strong>small</strong> brooch. <strong>The</strong> head, with<br />
the pin-fitting, is missing. <strong>The</strong> body consists of a rectangle<br />
framed by a single marginal moulding on a narrow foot<br />
tapering to a foot-knob with three <strong>small</strong> transverse<br />
mouldings. <strong>The</strong> rectangle on the bow probably held enamel.<br />
Similar, but more elaborate, brooches come from Nor'nour,<br />
Isles of Scilly (Hull 1968, Type 33) and date to the 2nd<br />
century.<br />
PENANNULAR BROOCHES<br />
Fowler Type A (1960, 150-2). Penannular<br />
brooches with rounded bulbous terminals (Fig 15;<br />
93-96).<br />
95 Fig 15 SF BKC 3476(C), K386 L40. Town ditch (F125) fill.<br />
Period 4a. Internal diameter 21.0mm. <strong>The</strong> pin and part of the<br />
ring of a Type A3 brooch. <strong>The</strong> pin has a strong hump. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
a single moulding at the knobbed terminal.<br />
96 Fig 15 SF LWC 1873(C), H97. Topsoil. <strong>Roman</strong>?/Anglo-<br />
Saxon?/post-medieval? Internal diameter 19.5 mm. A<br />
complete Type A4 brooch in five fragments. <strong>The</strong> pin has a<br />
slight dip. <strong>The</strong>re is a single moulding at the milled knobbed<br />
terminal.<br />
Fig 15 Penannular brooches: Fowler Type A (1:1)<br />
Fowler Type C (ibid. 152). Penannular brooches<br />
with the terminals coiled and twisted so that the<br />
coil is at right angles to the plane of the ring (Fig 16,<br />
97-103). <strong>The</strong> first three pieces (97-99) clearly<br />
belong to this type and date probably to the 1st<br />
century AD (or possibly earlier). Elizabeth Fowler has<br />
kindly contributed a note on the next four brooches<br />
(100-103) which represent a development of the<br />
earlier type.<br />
97 Fig 16 SF BKC 4893(C), T615. Unstratified. Internal<br />
18<br />
Fig 16 Penannular brooches: Fowler Type C (1:1)<br />
diameter 29.0mm. A distorted brooch with plain ring of<br />
circular section. <strong>The</strong> flattened terminals are rolled tightly<br />
into a spiral. <strong>The</strong>re is a slight hump in the centre of the pin.<br />
99 Fig 16 SF BUC 1718, H1066 G687. Grave fill. Period 1.<br />
Internal diameter 24.0mm. <strong>The</strong> ring is of circular section.<br />
<strong>The</strong> terminals have been flattened and rolled tightly into a<br />
spiral. <strong>The</strong> pin is straight.<br />
100 Fig 16 SF LWC 1889(C), H79 F10+F15+F32+F55. Medieval?<br />
Internal diameter 15.0mm. <strong>The</strong> flat section ring has<br />
terminals of a single coil. <strong>The</strong>re is slight notching on the<br />
outer edge of the upper face of the ring.<br />
101 Fig 16SFLW.C2100(C), H159. Machine clearance. Modern.<br />
Internal diameter 14.0mm. <strong>The</strong> ring is of circular section<br />
with a slightly flattened upper face. <strong>The</strong> terminals are of a<br />
single coil. <strong>The</strong> upper face is decorated with incised zig-zags.<br />
102 Fig 16 SF LWC 3980(C), R unstratified. Internal diameter<br />
13.5 mm. <strong>The</strong> ring is of flat section and is decorated on the<br />
upper face with deep chip-carved zig-zags and crosses. Each<br />
terminal is of one coil which has been slightly flattened and<br />
marked longitudinally by a clinching tool. <strong>The</strong> pin dips<br />
slightly in the centre.<br />
103 Fig 16 SF BUC 1689(C), H891 G647: Grave good or item of<br />
dress; on right shoulder. Period 2. Internal diameter oval,<br />
11.5 by 1 3.5 mm. Silver. <strong>The</strong> ring is of circular section and<br />
segmented. Each terminal is of one coil and is marked<br />
longitudinally by a clinching tool applied before the coil was<br />
formed. <strong>The</strong> mark runs from close to the segments of the<br />
ring all the way round the coil. <strong>The</strong> pin dips in the centre and<br />
is also marked along its midline by a clinching tool.<br />
Of the last four brooches only one (103) was found in<br />
a <strong>Roman</strong> context. However the discovery of this<br />
brooch, either an item of dress or deposited as a grave<br />
good, in an east-west oriented grave which can be<br />
dated to later than 367 on the evidence of a coin of<br />
Valens (367-75, CK 528) in the fill does not imply that<br />
all four brooches could be given such a late date. <strong>The</strong><br />
other three, however, do exhibit a style of decoration<br />
which suggests a late <strong>Roman</strong> date. <strong>The</strong> segmented<br />
ribbing of 103 (plus the fact that it is silver) links it to<br />
two curious Type Aa penannular brooches found in<br />
hoards of probable 4th-century date (Fowler 1964,<br />
110, note 6).<br />
Elizabeth Fowler writes: <strong>The</strong>se brooches are<br />
particularly interesting in view of some new work on