28.01.2013 Views

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unclassified (Fig 14; 88-92)<br />

88 Fig 14 SF LWC 3175(C), J947. Make-up or dump. Period 4.<br />

Length 42.0mm. A 'racquet'-shaped brooch with five<br />

circular lugs round the head and a sixth on the handle. Three<br />

of the lugs contain traces of white enamel. <strong>The</strong> pit in the<br />

centre of each lug may have contained a dot of contrasting<br />

enamel or copper-alloy. One of the lugs on a similar, though<br />

more heavily enamelled, brooch from Cramond, Lothian<br />

contained white enamel with 'a central brownish dot'<br />

(Maxwell 1974, 193). <strong>The</strong> date of the Cramond brooch is<br />

probably Antonine, which compares well with the context of<br />

this example. Another slightly similar brooch from<br />

Woodyates, Dorset is undated (Corp 4348).<br />

89 Fig 14 SF BKC 2473(C), G428 Surface cleaning. Period 5c.<br />

Length 37.5mm. A lozenge-shaped brooch with mosaic<br />

enamelling, possibly related to Type 226 (see 78 above).<br />

Within the copper-alloy rim there is a frame of red enamel<br />

around a design of nine rectangles of millefiori. <strong>The</strong> four<br />

blocks at each corner show a dark blue and white<br />

chessboard surrounded by a pale blue frame; the four<br />

between these, set in the manner of a St Andrew's cross, are<br />

of white enamel with two dark blue streaks running towards<br />

the centre. Enough of the middle block survives to show a<br />

yellow rectangle with black radiating spokes around a<br />

central red spot. <strong>The</strong> pin is missing. This brooch probably<br />

belongs to the 2nd-century floruit of enamelled brooches.<br />

90 Fig 14 SF BKC 2983(C), J36 L4. Dump. Period 5b. Length<br />

28.0mm. Two fragments of a <strong>small</strong> brooch. <strong>The</strong> head, with<br />

the pin-fitting, is missing. <strong>The</strong> body consists of a rectangle<br />

framed by a single marginal moulding on a narrow foot<br />

tapering to a foot-knob with three <strong>small</strong> transverse<br />

mouldings. <strong>The</strong> rectangle on the bow probably held enamel.<br />

Similar, but more elaborate, brooches come from Nor'nour,<br />

Isles of Scilly (Hull 1968, Type 33) and date to the 2nd<br />

century.<br />

PENANNULAR BROOCHES<br />

Fowler Type A (1960, 150-2). Penannular<br />

brooches with rounded bulbous terminals (Fig 15;<br />

93-96).<br />

95 Fig 15 SF BKC 3476(C), K386 L40. Town ditch (F125) fill.<br />

Period 4a. Internal diameter 21.0mm. <strong>The</strong> pin and part of the<br />

ring of a Type A3 brooch. <strong>The</strong> pin has a strong hump. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

a single moulding at the knobbed terminal.<br />

96 Fig 15 SF LWC 1873(C), H97. Topsoil. <strong>Roman</strong>?/Anglo-<br />

Saxon?/post-medieval? Internal diameter 19.5 mm. A<br />

complete Type A4 brooch in five fragments. <strong>The</strong> pin has a<br />

slight dip. <strong>The</strong>re is a single moulding at the milled knobbed<br />

terminal.<br />

Fig 15 Penannular brooches: Fowler Type A (1:1)<br />

Fowler Type C (ibid. 152). Penannular brooches<br />

with the terminals coiled and twisted so that the<br />

coil is at right angles to the plane of the ring (Fig 16,<br />

97-103). <strong>The</strong> first three pieces (97-99) clearly<br />

belong to this type and date probably to the 1st<br />

century AD (or possibly earlier). Elizabeth Fowler has<br />

kindly contributed a note on the next four brooches<br />

(100-103) which represent a development of the<br />

earlier type.<br />

97 Fig 16 SF BKC 4893(C), T615. Unstratified. Internal<br />

18<br />

Fig 16 Penannular brooches: Fowler Type C (1:1)<br />

diameter 29.0mm. A distorted brooch with plain ring of<br />

circular section. <strong>The</strong> flattened terminals are rolled tightly<br />

into a spiral. <strong>The</strong>re is a slight hump in the centre of the pin.<br />

99 Fig 16 SF BUC 1718, H1066 G687. Grave fill. Period 1.<br />

Internal diameter 24.0mm. <strong>The</strong> ring is of circular section.<br />

<strong>The</strong> terminals have been flattened and rolled tightly into a<br />

spiral. <strong>The</strong> pin is straight.<br />

100 Fig 16 SF LWC 1889(C), H79 F10+F15+F32+F55. Medieval?<br />

Internal diameter 15.0mm. <strong>The</strong> flat section ring has<br />

terminals of a single coil. <strong>The</strong>re is slight notching on the<br />

outer edge of the upper face of the ring.<br />

101 Fig 16SFLW.C2100(C), H159. Machine clearance. Modern.<br />

Internal diameter 14.0mm. <strong>The</strong> ring is of circular section<br />

with a slightly flattened upper face. <strong>The</strong> terminals are of a<br />

single coil. <strong>The</strong> upper face is decorated with incised zig-zags.<br />

102 Fig 16 SF LWC 3980(C), R unstratified. Internal diameter<br />

13.5 mm. <strong>The</strong> ring is of flat section and is decorated on the<br />

upper face with deep chip-carved zig-zags and crosses. Each<br />

terminal is of one coil which has been slightly flattened and<br />

marked longitudinally by a clinching tool. <strong>The</strong> pin dips<br />

slightly in the centre.<br />

103 Fig 16 SF BUC 1689(C), H891 G647: Grave good or item of<br />

dress; on right shoulder. Period 2. Internal diameter oval,<br />

11.5 by 1 3.5 mm. Silver. <strong>The</strong> ring is of circular section and<br />

segmented. Each terminal is of one coil and is marked<br />

longitudinally by a clinching tool applied before the coil was<br />

formed. <strong>The</strong> mark runs from close to the segments of the<br />

ring all the way round the coil. <strong>The</strong> pin dips in the centre and<br />

is also marked along its midline by a clinching tool.<br />

Of the last four brooches only one (103) was found in<br />

a <strong>Roman</strong> context. However the discovery of this<br />

brooch, either an item of dress or deposited as a grave<br />

good, in an east-west oriented grave which can be<br />

dated to later than 367 on the evidence of a coin of<br />

Valens (367-75, CK 528) in the fill does not imply that<br />

all four brooches could be given such a late date. <strong>The</strong><br />

other three, however, do exhibit a style of decoration<br />

which suggests a late <strong>Roman</strong> date. <strong>The</strong> segmented<br />

ribbing of 103 (plus the fact that it is silver) links it to<br />

two curious Type Aa penannular brooches found in<br />

hoards of probable 4th-century date (Fowler 1964,<br />

110, note 6).<br />

Elizabeth Fowler writes: <strong>The</strong>se brooches are<br />

particularly interesting in view of some new work on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!