Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
Colchester Archaeological Report 2: The Roman small finds
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Copper-alloy. Complete. Bent. Length approximately<br />
106.5mm. Maximum width 4.0mm.<br />
1982 Fig 70 SF BKC 4421(C), N437 F122. Clay-lined pit. Period<br />
5b2. Bone. Complete. Length 116.0mm. Maximum width<br />
5.0mm.<br />
b) figure-of-eight eye<br />
1986 Fig 70 SF BKC 3160(C), J100 F18. Slot. Period 5b. Bone. <strong>The</strong><br />
point is missing. Length 59.0mm. Maximum width 4.0mm.<br />
Type 3 (Fig 70; 1991-1995). Needles with a groove<br />
above and below the eye. All Type 3 needles are of<br />
copper alloy, and are thinner, resembling modern<br />
needles more closely, than both the preceding types.<br />
Only five examples are catalogued here, but all derive<br />
from 3rd- and 4th-century contexts, and a late <strong>Roman</strong><br />
date for the type agrees with evidence from other<br />
sites (eg ibid, fig 64, 230, 231). Similar needles have<br />
been found in post-<strong>Roman</strong> contexts on sites in<br />
<strong>Colchester</strong> and not all may necessarily be residual, as<br />
the type seems to recur in the post-medieval period.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no apparent use for the groove below the eye.<br />
It probably marked the line on which the eye should<br />
be made. Above the eye the groove could possibly<br />
serve to carry the thread so that the maximum<br />
thickness of the head was not increased. At least<br />
three of the five examples have had the eye cut<br />
through when cold. Only one (Fig 70, 1993) appears<br />
to have had the eye cast in the mould.<br />
1991 Fig 70 SF LWC 1153(C), B634 F225. Pit. Period5. Complete.<br />
Length 75.5mm. Maximum width 3.0mm. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />
marked striations along the groove, probably tool marks<br />
from cutting the groove and eye.<br />
1993 Fig 70 SF BKC 4379(C), N372 F111. Pit. Period 5b1.<br />
Complete. Length 99.5mm. Maximum width 1.5mm. <strong>The</strong><br />
eye was probably cast in the mould.<br />
NETTING NEEDLE (Fig 70, 1996)<br />
<strong>The</strong> standard form of netting needle has a pair of<br />
forked prongs at each end of the shaft. <strong>The</strong> pairs are<br />
set at right angles to each other. J P Wild (1970a, 73)<br />
puts forward the hypothesis that in the <strong>Roman</strong> period<br />
netting needles were used for band-weaving rather<br />
than netting.<br />
1996 Fig 70 SF BKC 4167, N105. Period 5 or 6. Copper-alloy. One<br />
pair of prongs is missing as well as the tip of one point of the<br />
other pair. Length 125.5 mm.<br />
SPINDLEWHORLS (Fig 71; 1997-2005)<br />
No spindles were found, and only a few spindlewhorls<br />
have been identified. All but one are made from<br />
sherds of coarse pottery. Many pierced pottery<br />
roundels were recovered, but only eight are<br />
considered to be spindlewhorls. <strong>The</strong> function of the<br />
remainder (2463-2482) is discussed on p 94.<br />
Four criteria were applied to the pierced roundels to<br />
determine which, if any, might have been used as<br />
spindlewhorls. First, that the perforation should be a<br />
minimum of 5.0 mm in diameter to enable a spindle to<br />
be inserted (ibid, 32). Second, that the diameter and<br />
thickness should be even and the sides smooth; and<br />
third, that the perforation should be central. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
last two factors govern the stability of the rotation of<br />
the spindle, and thereby the quality of the thread<br />
produced. Fourth, that the whorl should be no larger<br />
67<br />
than 50.0mm in diameter (ibid, 33; but see Fig 71,<br />
2003). Pieces f ulf illing the first three criteria but of an<br />
impracticable diameter were thus extracted. It is<br />
unfortunately possible that the application of these<br />
somewhat arbitrary standards has resulted in failure<br />
to identify some whorls.<br />
1997 Fig 71 SF LWC 424, B145. Cellar (F70) backfill,<br />
contaminated. Period 5+. <strong>The</strong> diameter is slightly uneven,<br />
34.0 by 35.0mm, but the sides are very smooth and the<br />
perforation well worn. Slightly chipped. Diameter of<br />
perforation 5.0mm. Upper surface slightly convex,<br />
maximum thickness 6.5 mm. Black burnished ware. 2ndcentury<br />
or later.<br />
2001 Fig 71 SF BKC 1653, D301 (F20). Tile scatter in town ditch.<br />
Anglo-Saxon. Damaged. Diameter 38.0mm, thickness<br />
10.0 mm. Made from the base of a colour-coat beaker. <strong>The</strong><br />
internal face of the base has been ground flat so that all<br />
traces of slip have been removed. <strong>The</strong> sides of the whorl<br />
have been rubbed in places. <strong>The</strong> perforation is well worn,<br />
diameter 7.0mm. 3rd- to 4th-century.<br />
2002 Fig 71 SF BKC 2680(C), H14 L2. Topsoil. Post-<strong>Roman</strong>. Shale.<br />
Slightly damaged and laminated. Diameter 38.5 mm,<br />
thickness 14.5 mm. Biconical in section, with a narrow<br />
groove on each flat face approximately 6.0mm from the<br />
perforation, which is 7.0 mm in diameter. This object would<br />
have been produced on a lathe, and the centre marks<br />
removed by the drilling of the perforation. Usually dated to<br />
the late 3rd century (Lawson 1976, 272).<br />
2003 Fig 71 SF MID 562, B2089 F685. Pit. Post-medieval to<br />
modern. Fragment. Diameter approximately 58.0mm,<br />
thickness 9.5 mm. <strong>The</strong> perforation is well worn, diameter<br />
8.5 mm. Black burnished ware. 2nd-century or later.<br />
2005 Fig 71 SF COC 151, 722 L196. Floor. Period 3. Slightly<br />
damaged. Diameter 37.5mm, thickness 7.0mm. <strong>The</strong> sides<br />
are very smooth and rounded. One part of the face is very<br />
smooth, possibly from constant handling at that spot. <strong>The</strong><br />
perforation is only slightly worn, diameter 5.0mm. Grey<br />
ware. <strong>Roman</strong>.<br />
Fig 71 Spindlewhorls (1:2)<br />
WEAVING TABLETS (Fig72; 2006-2007)<br />
Triangular or rectangular bone or bronze tablets<br />
pierced at each corner were used in the weaving of<br />
braid. A warp thread was passed through each hole<br />
and fixed in a frame. <strong>The</strong> number of tablets used