17.04.2013 Views

textul monologic şi textul dialogic din perspectiva analizei discursului

textul monologic şi textul dialogic din perspectiva analizei discursului

textul monologic şi textul dialogic din perspectiva analizei discursului

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52. Heshusius, L. Listening to Children: "What Could We Possibly Have in<br />

Common?". From Concerns with Self to Participatory Consciousness. În: Theory into practice,<br />

nr. 43(2), 1995, p. 117-123.<br />

53. Hutchby, I., Tanna, V. Aspects of Sequential Organization in Text Message<br />

Exchange. În: Discourse & Communication, 2008, nr. 2, p. 143-164.<br />

54. Hyland, K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum,<br />

2005. 230 p.<br />

55. Janks, H. Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool. 1997.<br />

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.133.1971&rep=rep1&type=pdf<br />

(vizitat 14. 04. 2010).<br />

56. Jaworski, A. ș.a. The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, 1999. 602 p.<br />

57. Jorgensen, M., Phillips J. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London:<br />

Sage, 2002. 229 p.<br />

58. Johnstone, B. Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. 336 p.<br />

59. Keevallik, L. Minimal Answers to Yes/No Questions in the Service of Sequence<br />

Organization. În: Discourse Studies, 2010, nr. 12(3), p. 283-309.<br />

60. Krishnamurti, U.G., Mind as Myth. http://www.intuition.org/txt/krishna.htm<br />

(vizitat la 30.05.2010)<br />

61. Leong Ping, A. Talking Themes: the Thematic Structure of talk. În: Discourse<br />

Studies, 2005, nr. 7(3), p. 701-732.<br />

108 p.<br />

62. Levinas E. Existence and Existents. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.<br />

63. Liddicoat, A. The Projectability of Turn Constructional Units and the Role of<br />

Prediction in Listening. În: Discourse Studies, 2004, nr. 6, p. 449-469.<br />

64. Lischinsky, A. Examples as Persuasive Argument in Popular Management<br />

Literature. În: Discourse & Communication, 2008, nr. 2, p. 243-269.<br />

65. Maigueneau, D. Analysis of an Academic Genre. În: Discourse Studies, 2002, nr.<br />

4, p. 319-341.<br />

66. Mann, William, Dialogue Macrogame Theory.<br />

http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/acl2002/DIALOG/pdfs/Dialog024.pdf (vizualizat 6.06. 2011)<br />

67. Mann, W., Thompson, S. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional<br />

Theory of Text Organization. 1988. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~nenkova/Courses/cis700-<br />

2/rst.pdf (vizitat 14. 04. 2010).<br />

68. Markova, I. Persuasion and Propaganda. În: Diogenes, 2008, nr. 55, p. 37-51.<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!