Maritime Trade and Transport - HWWI
Maritime Trade and Transport - HWWI
Maritime Trade and Transport - HWWI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fuijan (located opposite Taiwan) for oil/gas<br />
Hainan/Gu<strong>and</strong>ong – Containers<br />
Shanghai/Yangtse – Containers/coal<br />
Shenzhen/Pearl River – Containers/ore<br />
Tianjin/Beijing – Containers<br />
Along with the actual construction or expansion of ports, by 2015 some 270 additional container<br />
gantry cranes are to be installed. For Asia as a whole, ESCAP expects an increase of<br />
570 terminals. Average construction costs in 2005 amounted to $50,000 to 60,000 per unit<br />
(Regional Shipping <strong>and</strong> Port Development Strategies, New York, 2005).<br />
Interesting for the investor: The world leader in equipment of this type, with a share of<br />
approximately 50%, is Zhenhua Port Machinery. For mobile port cranes, for example, two<br />
German companies are far ahead of the rest: the stock market newcomer of 2006, Demag<br />
Cranes, with a world market share of 44%, <strong>and</strong> family-owned Liebherr Int. AG, with more than<br />
20%. Since December 2005, three major Chinese port operators have also gone public: Xiamen<br />
International Port Company, Dalian Port Company, <strong>and</strong>, in the summer of 2006, the<br />
1,700 times oversubscribed Tianjin Port Development, with a total issue volume of $1.1 bn.<br />
A representative of the port construction <strong>and</strong> infrastructure sector is China Merchants Holding.<br />
One of its 2006 orders was a $550 bn contract in Qinhuangdao.<br />
It is no wonder: Chinese companies account for a world market share of 90% in the<br />
production of hardtop containers. Absolutely leaders are CIMC (50% share, not listed on the<br />
stock market) <strong>and</strong> Singama (20% share, Hong Kong Stock Exchange).<br />
5.1.3 Selected OECD nations<br />
The most urgent capacity bottlenecks have plagued Australia. The government <strong>and</strong> private<br />
investors have reacted. They plan to invest AU $10 bn in port expansion by the end of the<br />
decade. The largest private operator of coal <strong>and</strong> ore shipment locations in Waratah (BHP Billiton)<br />
<strong>and</strong> Dalrymple (Prime Infrastructure) will contribute more than AU $1 bn <strong>and</strong> will double<br />
their capacities. According to statements by the Australian Council for Infrastructure<br />
Development, an additional AU $8 bn will be required for changes in the railroad network.<br />
Australia <strong>and</strong> Canada are considered the “mother country” of the mixed public-private finance<br />
model (see Chapter 7).<br />
Between 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2007, the USA will have invested close to $10 bn alone to eliminate the<br />
most serious bottlenecks. Striking, however, is the fact that, beyond this “emergency management,”<br />
hardly any long-term strategic plans exist on the federal level.<br />
That is, except for security measures of all kinds. One exception is the “Plan for Action,”<br />
extending to the year 2030, passed by the Southern California Regional Strategy for Goods<br />
Movement in February 2005. As you will remember: California itself, with a GDP of $1,540 bn,<br />
Berenberg Bank · <strong>HWWI</strong>: Strategy 2030 · No. 4<br />
89