Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

C. Judicial Considerations
GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
I shall now turn to a subject area in which I am not an expert and in
which the Court has the advantage of me, namely judicial questions. I
would nevertheless like to make a few remarks on this subject, yet I do
ask the Court’s leniency, should my knowledge not always meet professional
standards.
I. A Comparison of Two Systems of Justice
First I would like to juxtapose the conditions of the Federal German
judicial system, as I have observed and experienced them, with the judicial
system of another country that I will name at the end of this comparison.
I shall first quote text passages from a book of a prominent author
in which the legal system of this yet unnamed country is commented
upon. Then I shall compare this quotation with conditions in Germany
from my perspective. The source reference of each quotation contains
in parenthesis the volume and page number of the quoted work.
Our unnamed author describes in detail special government units in
his country which serve the prosecution of politically motivated
“crimes,” which mostly refer to undesirable expressions of opinion.
In Germany such special units exist as well, as I discovered to my
great surprise at the end of the year 1992. At that time I received a letter
from a certain “Dezernat Staatsschutz” (Department for State Protection)
without letterhead or signature and printed on a cheap old fashioned
dot matrix printer. The letter stated that an investigation had been
launched against me concerning the suspicion of incitement of the
masses, allegedly committed with my expert report on Auschwitz. Since
I was firmly convinced that there no longer existed any political police
in the “most liberal state of German history” which is carrying on the
tradition of the Gestapo and Stasi, I at first thought that the letter was a
forgery by some jokester. Unfortunately an inquiry soon taught me
“better,” however. Later I learned that the staff of this State Protection
Police evidently goes through a specific political training so that for
example those officials prosecuting right-wing “thought crimes” would
have no sympathies for right-wing opinions, and vice versa for leftwing
thought crimes. As we can read in the criminal statistics published
99