Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
It may well be true that evidence was destroyed – something that
Mayer considers unnecessary to prove, but which is very necessary indeed!
– but the reason why no evidence exists is irrelevant; non-existent
evidence simply proves nothing.
Example 2:
The late Prof. Raul Hilberg, in his day the most worldwide acclaimed
historian of the “Holocaust” – acclaimed by mainstream society,
not by me! – has stated the following: 95
“But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction [of the
Jews] not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency.
There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive
measures. They [these measures] were taken step by step, one step at
a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but
an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus mind reading by a farflung
[German] bureaucracy.”
Let me now place Hilberg’s thesis in the above used pattern:
Thesis: A gigantic genocide took place.
Demand: Verifiable proof.
1st Support Thesis: No evidence has been created.
Demand: How was it implemented? Explanation required.
2nd Support Thesis: By mind reading.
Since the second support thesis lies outside the realm of modern scientific
research, Hilberg has logically “immunized” his theory against
refutation.
Example 3:
Let us now look at the holes in the roof of Morgue no. 1 in Crematory
II of Auschwitz Birkenau. According to eyewitness testimony,
Zyklon B granules were dropped into this morgue through holes in its
roof in order to commit mass gassings.
Preliminary Theses: (based on testimony, in contradiction to evidence.)
– Summer 1941: Auschwitz Concentration Camp receives orders for
mass exterminations.
– Fall 1941: The first test gassing takes place.
– Winter 1941: Implementation & start of mass exterminations.
95 Newsday, Long Island, New York, 23 Feb. 1983, p. II/3.
73