Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
The reasons (evidence) for our pre-judgments must be testable as well
as possible (empirically falsifiable).
We must both actively and passively test and criticize:
Test and criticize pre-judgments and reasons of others.
Invite others to test and criticize our pre-judgments and welcome
this activity (duty to publish).
Address the tests and critiques of others and test and criticize them
likewise (don’t back down too fast).
We have to avoid immunizing our pre-judgments:
Avoid auxiliary theories.
Select data only according to objective criteria (source criticism).
Use exact, consistent and constant definitions of terms.
Avoid attacks on persons as substitute for factual arguments.
What is Pseudo-Science?
The accusation of pseudo-science is levied against us revisionists as
a foregone conclusion and mostly without any reason or evidence given.
“Pseudo” is Greek and means as much as “false.” For this reason pseudo-science
needs not be defined here, since it is but the complement to
science, of course with gradual transitions. The less the above mentioned
principles are maintained, the worse (more false) is the corresponding
science. 118
Now, the prosecution appears to represent the point of view that
“pseudo-science” needs to be officially prohibited. At least that would
be the consequence, if one raised their principle to a general law, which
is one of the main characteristics of a nation under the rule of laws. This
would be a dangerous path, however. Because according to what I have
presented here, one could and indeed would have to assume the position
that the majority of the established literature regarding the “Holocaust”
is pseudo-scientific, which is also the opinion expressed by such famed
authors as Norman Finkelstein 119 and Raul Hilberg 120 – albeit with other
118 Cf. the more detailed discussion in Germar Rudolf, Lectures, op. cit. (note 55), pp. 487-496;
Germar Rudolf, Kardinalfragen, op. cit. (note 47) pp. 143-165; Vierteljahreshefte für freie
Geschichtsforschung 7(3&4) (2003), pp. 403-405, along a different line of arguments yet with a
similar result.
119 Norman G. Finkelstein, Ruth Bettina Birn, A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical
Truth, Metropolitan Books, New York 1998, esp. pp. 88-92; N.G. Finkelstein, The Holocaust
Industry: Reflections of the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, Verso, London/New York
2000, p. 55: “Articulating the key Holocaust dogmas, much of the literature on Hitler’s ‘final
solution’ is worthless as scholarship.”
91