Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
Hence, if the equal treatment as mandated by the German Basic Law
exists, nobody’s honor is insulted by my publications, and there is
therefore no conflict with the civil rights of others.
The third and last restriction to free speech as listed in article 5, paragraph
2, concerns the law for the protection of the youth. According to
a decision by the German Constitutional High Court, censorship for
reasons of protecting the youth is permissible only, if a danger to the
youth derives “always and typically” from the thusly censored views.
These empty word shells open the floodgates to arbitrariness, though. I
will get back to that later.
There used to be a time when I was proud of the fact that, in contrast
to the constitutions of other countries, the German Basic Law not only
guarantees freedom of speech, but in addition to that also and expressly
the freedom of research, teaching, and science. Today, however, I consider
this division of free speech into scientific and non-scientific opinions
to be a tragedy, because it leads to a two-class system of free
speech law. Whereas freedom of speech for laymen, that is: nonscientists,
can be easily restricted by simple laws, it remains unfettered
for scientists and researchers.
Should a researcher get obstreperous, however, then the state swiftly
disenfranchises him of the status as a scientist and prosecutes him as a
“pseudo-scientist” or lay person. This two-class law therefore permits
the state to keep everybody perfectly in leading strings while maintaining
the illusory impression of maximum freedom.
The thesis about the conflict between civil rights as maintained by
the German jurisdiction is wrong also because most Jews would be horrified,
if they knew that impeccable scientists are being persecuted in
their name. No Jew reading my books with common sense will find
anything malicious or inciting in them.
In this context I may once more mention my former Jewish girlfriend
Jodi Keating and her family, who clearly prove my claim, as they
had no problems at all with my views. I may also mention that there are
a number of Jewish revisionists, among them for example David Cole,
who I had the honor to call a friend. During the early and mid-1990s he
worked closely together with various revisionists and stepped into the
background only after he had received death threats by his co-religionists
due to his involvement. I may also mention Israel Shamir as my
last example. In the 1960s Shamir immigrated to Israel from the USSR
and participated as a soldier in Israel’s wars. He later became a journal-
127