08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

words, which I do not want to read out aloud here, but which I want to<br />

leave for your exclusive perusal, as I do not wish to provoke anyone. 165<br />

As these much more radical statements did not lead to any measures<br />

of prosecution in Germany, my statements must not lead to a prosecution<br />

either – provided there is equality before the law in this country.<br />

Later on we will introduce excerpts from various books in which these<br />

and other similar statements can be found. 166<br />

III. Lectures on the Holocaust<br />

In the indictment the prosecution requested to have my book Lectures<br />

on the Holocaust seized and destroyed. In my view it is important<br />

for the court to understand what that means, in case you decide here to<br />

seize my book indeed. A while ago I gave you a photocopy containing a<br />

newspaper article published in the Austrian weekly Zur Zeit. 167 This<br />

article reports on how an academic anthology published in commemoration<br />

of the German historian Prof. Dr. Hellmut Diwald was seized by<br />

means of a court order, because it contains a contribution by Prof. Hepp<br />

sporting a footnote in Latin in which Prof. Hepp declares to doubt the<br />

veracity of the story about gas chambers for the extermination of Jews<br />

in extermination camps of the Third Reich. This footnote in Latin was<br />

allegedly inflammatory. It is a mystery to me, though, how a few sentences<br />

in a footnote in the Latin language can incite anybody nowadays,<br />

as hardly anybody understands that language. Fact is that the book was<br />

seized for that very reason and that the confiscated copies were subsequently<br />

destroyed in a waste incinerator under police supervision. Police<br />

supervision was probably considered necessary to ensure that none<br />

of the garbage men would read or maybe even sell the book instead of<br />

burning it.<br />

The contribution by Prof. Hepp which was considered offensive incidentally<br />

is the same as the one I have quoted earlier regarding<br />

Auschwitz as Germany’s Great Taboo. Hence, even the Federal Repub-<br />

165 “Fraud” (Norman Finkelstein, stern, 1 Feb. 2001); “blackmail” (Norman Finkelstein, Die Welt,<br />

6 Feb. 2001; Raul Hilberg, Die Weltwoche, Zurich, 11 Feb. 1999; Raul Hilberg, <strong>Is</strong>rael Nachrichten,<br />

31 Jan. 1999); “scam,” (Norman Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah, Verso, New York<br />

2008, p. 61).<br />

166 Cf. the excerpts in Appendix 1, starting on p. 220.<br />

167 Zur Zeit (Vienna), no. 9, 27 Feb. 1998; cf. the excerpts in Appendix 6, p. 338.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!