08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

The information scientist Prof. Dr. Karl Steinbuch, who had to experience<br />

the collapse of discussion culture at German universities in the<br />

early 1970s when left-wing radical students saw to it by means of socalled<br />

“sit-ins” that inconvenient professors could no longer teach,<br />

wrote about that in wise foresight: 199<br />

“One does not admit that democracy consists of letting the other<br />

talk as well, and that discussing starts with listening. This depressing<br />

style of public discourse will finally lead to de-democratization.”<br />

Several decades in advance, the Spanish sociologist José Ortega y<br />

Gasset, whom I have also quoted before, characterized absolutely accurately<br />

that, which has been happening ever since in Germany, by writing:<br />

200<br />

“‘to have done with discussions,’ […] means that there is a renunciation<br />

of the common life based on culture, […] and a return to<br />

the common life of barbarism.”<br />

That you are not trying to dissuade me from my opinion with arguments,<br />

but instead by refusing any discussion and by striving to throw<br />

me into prison, is exactly this relapse into barbarity. Because, as Karl<br />

Steinbuch has said it: 201<br />

“[… the] prerequisite of any credible and enforceable behavioral<br />

norm in our time [is] its justification by means of comprehensible<br />

necessities […].”<br />

Threats of violence, however, are not justifications by means of<br />

comprehensible necessities. He who refuses a discussion and uses violence<br />

instead has stopped justifying. He then can no longer expect to be<br />

understood.<br />

Alexander and Margarete Mitscherlich have become famous with<br />

their book The Inability to Mourn, which was a milestone of the Federal<br />

German process of coming to terms with the German past. But the<br />

premise with which both authors have written their book seems to have<br />

been overlooked, which is why I may call it to mind here from their<br />

introduction: 202<br />

“<strong>Is</strong> the German people’s striving for wealth truly accompanied<br />

by a newborn love for liberty? <strong>Is</strong> their ability to tolerate and respect<br />

199<br />

Karl Steinbuch, Kurskorrektur, Seewald, Stuttgart 1973, p. 98.<br />

200<br />

José Ortega y Gasset, op. cit. (note 61), p. 135; Engl. ed. (note 61), p. 56.<br />

201<br />

Karl Steinbuch, op. cit. (note 199), p. 60.<br />

202<br />

Alexander and Margarete Mitscherlich, The Inability to Mourn, Grove Press, New York 1975,<br />

p. xxiv.<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!