08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

sionist material. If this material itself is legitimate, then so is promotion<br />

material for it, for instance the promotional brochures quoted in the indictment.<br />

IV. Additional Judicial Observations<br />

In no. 5 of volume 52 (May 2002) of the German journal Osteuropa<br />

an article entitled “The Number of Victims of Auschwitz. New Insights<br />

Based on Archival Discoveries” 177 was published which was authored<br />

by the Managing Editor Fritjof Meyer of the German news magazine<br />

Der Spiegel (pp. 631–641). In it Meyer stated that the total victim number<br />

of the Auschwitz camp claimed at war’s end was “a product of war<br />

propaganda,” but even the number of 1.5 million spread by the Auschwitz<br />

Museum today is too high by a factor of three. Meyer considers<br />

eyewitness testimonies regarding mass gassing partly implausible, and<br />

he claims against the official “truth” which is considered “self-evident”<br />

that, of the six homicidal gas chamber buildings which allegedly existed<br />

in Auschwitz-Birkenau, only two had actually served as sites of mass<br />

executions.<br />

Although criminal complaints were filed and thus police investigations<br />

initiated against Meyer and the editors of this magazine for “Holocaust<br />

denial,” these investigations were eventually shelved. 178 The Public<br />

Prosecution of Bochum determined in its ruling to stop the proceedings<br />

“that, on the background of the social adequacy clause of article<br />

86, Paragraph III, German Penal Code, as invoked by article 130, paragraph<br />

V, German Penal Code, a scientific debate about causes, scope,<br />

and consequences of the National Socialist genocide committed against<br />

the Jewish people must remain permissible,” a fact which also applies<br />

to my book Lectures on the Holocaust, whose scientific depth and<br />

scope is much larger than the superficial and methodically questionable<br />

work by Herr Meyer, which for instance lacks any systematic source<br />

criticism. 179 Meyer’s mere claim that certain statements are implausible,<br />

177 “Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz. Neue Erkenntnisse durch neue Archivfunde”<br />

178 Staatsanwaltschaft Bochum, ref. 33 Js 145/03 of 6 May 2003; Staatsanwaltschaft Stuttgart, ref.<br />

4 Js 75185/92, of 28 May 2003, confirmed by General-Staatsanwaltschaft Stuttgart, ref. 25 Zs<br />

1110/03, of 16 July 2003.<br />

179 Cf. the following critiques: <strong>Germar</strong> <strong>Rudolf</strong>, “Cautious Mainstream Revisionism,” The Revisionist<br />

1(1) (2003), pp. 23-30; Carlo Mattogno, “Auschwitz: Fritjof Meyer’s New Revisions,” ibid.,<br />

pp. 30-37; Carlo Mattogno, “On the Piper-Meyer-Controversy: Soviet Propaganda vs. Pseudo-<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!