Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
Prof. Dr. phil. h.c. Emil Schlee… the 27th of July 2006
Herr Dr. Rolf Kosiek…
Dear Dr. Kosiek,
After several weeks in the hospital and of treatment of a once more
inflamed old war injury (left thigh, I had 8 injuries) I can only now answer
your letter of 18 June 2006. I beg for your understanding. Workwise
I unfortunately keep being a drop-out for the time being, as I have
to lie and take it easy.
But now to the point: Already decades ago and almost simultaneously
with Prof. Haverbeck I performed an assessment of the works by
Herr Rudolf in terms of correct scientific methods, which Herr Rudolf
has also published in one of his journals. By us not an official expert
report, as not requested, but a deliberate support and affirmation of his
work initiated already at that time. I cannot remember anymore when
and where it appeared. It is beyond dispute that Herr Rudolf meets the
formal criteria. To insinuate anything else would be pure malice! One
ought to ask rather, how a court can justify the term of so-called “selfevidence”
as one that can be used scientifically.
Since I have been a heart patient for three years (with daily ???) and
my availability for a public appearance remains questionable with the
current health condition and hindrance of mobility, I am currently certainly
not the convincing and usable expert witness. For this, too, I beg
your understanding.
In this context I spontaneously recall the jurist Prof. Dr. Dr. Dr. h.c.
Klaus Sojka (see attached reference), who could be approached in the
matter?! I regret that I cannot help more!
Attached also material in the Holocaust matter, which I partly procured
from the USA. This “handout” from me had been for the audience!
With my best regards, your E. Schlee
255