08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

This point illustrates the sociological background of this trial. As a<br />

consequence of this present day German taboo, no individual in our society<br />

can express himself rationally, objectively and candidly about this<br />

taboo, because either he complies with it and is thereby biased, or else<br />

he is under a permanent threat of exclusion, persecution and of being<br />

himself taboo-ized, hence finding himself in a state of duress. This is of<br />

course particularly true of you as judges in this criminal trial.<br />

For the scientist, however, taboos are strictly unacceptable.<br />

The two non-negotiable main pillars of scientific endeavor are therefore:<br />

1. Freedom of Hypothesis: At the beginning of the quest for creating<br />

knowledge any question may be asked. Doubt as the intellectual basis<br />

of all humans can be expressed as a simple question: “<strong>Is</strong> this really<br />

true?” Thus curiosity is nothing other than reason posing questions<br />

in search of answers. In scientific research there are many<br />

terms for these questions, as for example “research desiderata,” all<br />

of which ultimately come to the same thing.<br />

2. Undetermined Outcome: The answers to research questions can be<br />

determined exclusively by verifiable evidence. They cannot be determined<br />

by taboos or official guidelines laid down by scientific, societal,<br />

religious, political, judicial or other authorities. This is in<br />

keeping with Kant’s maturity described above, that is, the ideal of<br />

the enlightenment.<br />

If answers to scientific questions are prescribed, then posing questions<br />

is degraded to a mere rhetorical farce, and science becomes impossible.<br />

This is therefore not just an undermining of the essential nature<br />

of science, but its complete abolition.<br />

The greater a taboo and the more severe the persecution of taboobreakers<br />

are, the more appropriate and even required are skepticism,<br />

doubt, and distrust. Those who forcefully try to prevent critical illumination<br />

of such taboos must be asked how many skeletons they are trying<br />

to hide in their own basements.<br />

In this regard, the German physicist George Christoph Lichtenberg<br />

very fittingly remarked: 72<br />

“The most common opinions and what everyone considers unquestionable<br />

often deserve most to be investigated.”<br />

72 Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, Vermischte Schriften, vol. 1, Dieterich, Göttingen 1853, p. 98.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!