08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

lic of Germany conducts book burnings in keeping with a sad German<br />

tradition. During the Third Reich this was performed publically by Berlin<br />

students on that infamous evening at the Opernplatz in Berlin, at<br />

which Josef Goebbels was present and gave a speech.<br />

Today this is done in secrecy in order that the public doesn’t notice<br />

anything.<br />

Heinrich Heine once wrote: 168<br />

“This was a prelude only. Where they burn books, so too will<br />

they in the end burn human beings.”<br />

Hence, before you decide to continue on this disastrous path of the<br />

Federal German society by adding one more step, you should at least<br />

know what you are delivering to the flames. My lawyer will therefore<br />

now file a motion to have my book read during these proceedings.<br />

(The court decides subsequently that the book will be read by the<br />

judges in privacy. Three weeks pass before the next scheduled court<br />

day. By then all judges and one lay judge have read the book, whereas<br />

the second lay judge has read only the first four lectures, yet she states<br />

that she will read the last one as well.)<br />

1. General Accusations<br />

The prosecution’s claim is wrong that I would “deny the genocide<br />

organized by the state” (p. 13, similar p. 17, point 2.c). The book expressly<br />

confirms that the measures of persecution of National Socialism<br />

against the Jews meet the definition of article 6, paragraph 1, of the International<br />

Penal Code, which means that it was genocide even from my<br />

revisionist point of view. 169<br />

The prosecution’s claim that I have given myself “a decidedly scientific<br />

appearance already by the title of the work” (p. 29) is absolutely<br />

irrelevant, because the matter at hand is not whether I am scientific in<br />

nature, but whether the book in question is. This statement proves the<br />

profound lack of comprehension of the prosecution who apparently<br />

thinks that the scientific nature of a work can be determined by the<br />

opinions and motives of its author. But that is not so. 170<br />

168 In his 1821 play Almansor.<br />

169 Lectures, op. cit. (not. 55) p. 520, see further down in chapter D.III.3.<br />

170 See ch. B.III.4, starting at p. 89.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!