08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

therefore may point out the following, which partially derives logically<br />

from what has been presented up to now:<br />

It is the right and the duty of the scientist to make the results of his<br />

research available to:<br />

1. the scientific community;<br />

2. society at large.<br />

This obligation arises in turn from the obligation<br />

– to expose the work to critique;<br />

– to assume accountability for one’s activities;<br />

– to inform society at large about new discoveries.<br />

This right includes publication<br />

a) of the scientific work itself;<br />

b) of fact-oriented popularized presentation of the same for the information<br />

of non-scientists and students;<br />

c) of fact-oriented promotion for a) and b) above in order to announce<br />

and disseminate.<br />

Considered formally, publications under b) and c) above are not, or<br />

only under certain conditions, scientific in nature, but they are still pivotal<br />

for science. If the right of publication is restricted, then does not<br />

only the indispensable communication among scientists and between<br />

scientists and society collapse, but science itself comes to a standstill.<br />

This also has drastic disadvantageous effects for our modern society<br />

based on the division of labor, which depends on science and on communicating<br />

with it.<br />

I mention this here also because I am standing before this Court not<br />

only because of the scientific works I have written, published or distributed,<br />

but also because of advertising brochures and flyers with which I<br />

have advertized my products. I would never claim that such material<br />

meets the standards of scientific writings. They cannot and they should<br />

not do that. But as I explained above, they must still enjoy the protection<br />

of freedom of science, because they serve science, for without public<br />

announcement of their existence and results, science cannot continue<br />

to exist.<br />

After all, science thrives primarily by public critical discussion, and<br />

it dies, if that discussion is forbidden. In this sense I will now conclude<br />

my presentations on science and its nature by once more quoting Karl<br />

Popper: 123<br />

123 Karl Popper, Objective Knowledge, op. cit. (note 67), p. 22.<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!