08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

tion: can we determine whether Plato’s works are scientific in nature,<br />

even though we know nothing about the author? Answer: Yes we can,<br />

since the features of his work are determined by investigating the work,<br />

not the author.<br />

Ex. 2: Nicolaus Copernicus. From his foreword emerges a derogatory<br />

attitude toward the Catholic Church, which contributed to his book<br />

being censored. Question: Do Copernicus’ polemics harm the scientific<br />

nature of his work? Answer: No, because first of all his polemics can be<br />

justified, and second because the polemics have no effect on the work<br />

itself and on the arguments. Arguments are what count, not political or<br />

religious suspicions.<br />

Ex.3: A hypothetical author writes a scientific book under a pseudonym.<br />

The author remains unknown. Question: Can we determine<br />

whether the book is scientific in nature? Answer: Yes we can, because<br />

the question has nothing to do with the author.<br />

Ex. 4: What would you do in order to determine the characteristics<br />

of a Porsche 911? a) The <strong>Rudolf</strong> Method: buy and test drive a Porsche;<br />

or b) the method of Judge Meinerzhagen and the prosecution: Put Wendelin<br />

Wiedeking, the chairman of the Porsche Corporation, on the psychiatrist’s<br />

couch and question him about psycho-social disruptions and<br />

politico-religious anomalies? Or one could also argue in the style of<br />

Judge Meinerzhagen that, because Wendelin Wiedeking is corpulent, he<br />

is incapable of constructing sports cars?<br />

The logic used by the Judge Meinerzhagen is just as conclusive as<br />

the saying<br />

At night it is colder than outside.<br />

Entire categories of logic are being confused here. Of course there is<br />

some connection between nighttime, colder, and outside; but it most<br />

certainly doesn’t work the way I just expressed it. In the same way one<br />

cannot transpose the – often only insinuated – characteristics of an author<br />

linearly onto his works.<br />

Summary<br />

What <strong>Is</strong> Science?<br />

There are no (final) judgments, but rather always only more or less<br />

reliable (preliminary) pre-judgments.<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!