Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
interpreter during a presentation by Leuchter, was sentenced to many
months imprisonment. His defense lawyer, the lawyer Bock, had to face
a fine for a motion which he had filed during the Deckert trial while
exercising his duty as a defense lawyer, and the judge of the first instance
of the case, who had sentenced Deckert only to a prison term on
probation, was retired shortly afterwards after massive political interventions.
Leuchter was arrested and indicted as well.
After this had made me sensitive, I followed among the subsequent
trials with particular attention those against the certified chemist Germar
Rudolf, the historian Udo Walendy, and finally against the Australian
citizen Dr. Fredrick Toben. In each of those trials the judiciary followed
the same pattern. Such statements were indicted and punished
which in the eyes of the court questioned crimes by the Nazis. It was
expressly rejected to discuss these statements or even to evaluate their
veracity. For a verdict of many months imprisonment it sufficed that
these statements, although presented in a matter-of-factual way and scientifically
substantiated, contradicted an undefined version of history
which is nonetheless dictated as politically correct. In the case of Dr.
Toben neither the prosecutor nor the judge were led astray by the fact
that the defendant as an Australian citizen had posted his statements on
the Internet from within Australia, where those acts are not subject to
prosecution. Liberties granted in Australia were denied in Germany.
In all these cases the prosecution is accompanied by an all-encompassing
media campaign. The objects of that campaign are suspected of
harboring “right-wing extremist views” and are stigmatized morally.
Politicians and the public demand drastic punishments. The media only
report about the verdict but nothing at all about the punished statements.
Publishers, authors, translators and even typesetters who dare to deviate
from the [official] line are confronted with being publicly suspected of
having “right-wing views,” with being verbally and physically threatened,
and with being labeled as “Nazis” on cars, houses and fences.
Their offices and editorial departments are targets for nocturnal vandalism.
Not even banks remain passive, but cancel their business relationships
and the accounts of those thusly “ousted” under specious pretexts.
That these are not isolated cases results from the fact that between
1994 and 1997 some 17,208 penal proceedings were conducted against
so-called “propaganda offenses.” The list of banned books and magazines
is long but not public. Undesirable literature is confiscated and
330