Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY tion logically impossibly, is grossly unscientific, as it is thusly immunized against any attempt at refutation. It therefore can, indeed it has to be concluded that the following is the reason why the expert witness has not investigated these essential aspects of the nature of science (or maybe he is not even aware of them?): because he himself is part of this established unscientific attitude. Finally one would have wished that the expert witness had given his expert report a systematic structure – this, too, is a hallmark of science! – for instance by initially explaining in a substantiated way, which criteria of the nature of science he considers relevant, in order to then use them as a yardstick to assess the individual contributions of the book at issue. C. Conclusions The expert witness – has essentially missed the topic of his assignment for an expert report, because some 2 /3 of his expert report do not address the topic of his assignment; – has transgressed the area of competence as an expert by commenting on topics for which he is not an expert according to his own statements or which even originate from utterly foreign disciplines; – has not performed his assignment professionally by omitting essential aspects of his assignment for an expert report – various criteria of the nature of science – and by repeatedly and at times in a massive way violating scientific principles himself. Hence both the expert report and the expert witness have to be rejected as utterly unsuitable pieces of evidence. <strong>Germar</strong> <strong>Rudolf</strong>, Heidelberg, 24 February 2007 Postscriptum The above verdict is harsh. It may even be unfair, for Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte did not write his expert assessment of “my” book for the isolated use of a few judges looking for an expert opinion on the nature of science and how my book fits into it. Prof. Nolte was well aware that his expert report would eventually end up in the public domain, and that 303
GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY this would be the real litmus test for his assessment: how would the public at large and his opponents in academia and in the media react to his courageous – or reckless? – defense of one of the most vilified Holocaust deniers? Hence Nolte’s expert report is primarily an attempt at self-justification written in a way to pre-emptively fend off the attacks he expects to come from his opponents and enemies. And as such it may well be regarded as a masterpiece. 304
Page 2:
GERMAR RUDOLF · RESISTANCE IS OBLI
Page 5 and 6:
Germar Rudolf: Resistance Is Obliga
Page 7 and 8:
GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGA
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 32 and 33:
A. Introduction GERMAR RUDOLF, RESI
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
B. Scientific Considerations I. The
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Arbitrary Selection/Elimination GER
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 144 and 145:
D. Specific Considerations I. Gener
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
3. Passion GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANC
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
7. The Hoax of the Twentieth Centur
Page 176:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 210 and 211:
F. Conclusion GERMAR RUDOLF, RESIST
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
G. Path of Most Resistance GERMAR R
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
H. Appendices GERMAR RUDOLF, RESIST
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Annex 13 GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255: GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGA
Page 338 and 339: Appendix 6: Book Burning GERMAR RUD
Page 340 and 341: Appendix 7: The Verdict I. General
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Attorneys L. Bock, Liebfrauenstr. 1
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Dissecting the Holocaust. The Growi
Page 372 and 373:
Chelmno: A German Camp in History &
Page 374 and 375:
Special Treatment inAuschwitz: Orig
Page 376 and 377:
Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies and P
show all

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?