08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

investigation five months later due to the same words, although now in<br />

writing.<br />

This penal investigation was stayed in April 2008 as a result of my<br />

defense lawyer’s negotiating skills, though. 172<br />

Hence, as a precautional measure I have severely expurgated the<br />

subsequent chapters by merely addressing two exemplary quotations<br />

instanced by the prosecution. I have moreover rewritten the original<br />

statements in such a way that they do no longer contain any quotations<br />

from my prohibited book, but only descriptions of the content. Furthermore<br />

those passages in particular have been deleted which met with<br />

obvious disapproval of the prosecution and/or of the court.<br />

He who wants to read the exact quotes is free to read the indictment<br />

160 and to compare it with my book.<br />

* * *<br />

The prosecution’s quotations from the book Lectures on the Holocaust<br />

on pages 13–16 of the indictment are either incomplete, selective,<br />

or have been ripped out of their context. By so doing the meaning of<br />

some of these quotes has been distorted. Other quotes obviously do not<br />

meet any criteria required to render them prosecutable. In contrast to<br />

this, such quotes which would refute the prosecution’s accusations have<br />

been totally omitted. Hence and in summary, the prosecution is guilty of<br />

having committed distorting falsification. The following has to be remarked<br />

about the individual quotations as listed in the indictment: (Lectures<br />

= Lectures on the Holocaust)<br />

p. 13 Indictment, p. 17 Lectures:<br />

On page 15 to 17 of the Lectures an article in the German newspaper<br />

Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung (FAZ) is discussed which reports<br />

about a total of 26 million people who perished in the camps of the<br />

Third Reich as well as about shoes as traces of the crime. It is selfevident<br />

and in need of no further proof that the death toll of 26 million<br />

hawked around by the FAZ is excessively inflated. Furthermore the<br />

question of whether or not shoes as such are evidence for crimes is critically<br />

discussed on those pages. This claim is corrected by an official<br />

Polish-communist source which established as early as 1969 that the<br />

shoes found in the Majdanek camp did not belong to the victims of the<br />

172 Acc. to article 154, paragraph 1, German Penal Law (the expected punishment “does not carry<br />

weight” in comparison to the valid conviction); Staatsanwaltschaft Mannheim, ref. 503 Js<br />

22710/07, of 15 April 2008.<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!