08.03.2013 Views

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY<br />

dissertation research on the chemistry of higher silicon-hydrogen compounds,<br />

he contradicted what had been more speculated than “known”<br />

in scientific literature on the subject. Because of the assumption that<br />

whatever has been written in scientific literature must be true – the erroneous<br />

assumption of many scientists – Dr. Plichta found himself opposed<br />

by overwhelming dogmatic belief. He thus stated pointedly: 75<br />

“The foundation of every creative process is thinking your own<br />

thoughts and doubting whatever exists.”<br />

As the counterpoint to this allow me to quote the “créme de la<br />

créme” of French Holocaust historians in their reaction to revisionist<br />

theses concerning the technical feasibility of the alleged mass murders:<br />

76<br />

“It is forbidden to ask how such mass murder was possible. It<br />

was technically possible because it happened. This is the obligatory<br />

point of departure for every historical investigation of this subject.<br />

We must simply keep this truth in mind: There is no debate concerning<br />

the existence of gas chambers and no such debate may be permitted.”<br />

Here we have dogmatism and hostility to science par excellence!<br />

The first sentence prohibits questioning; the second sentence is an impermissible<br />

circular reasoning; the third sentence announces dogma;<br />

and the fourth combines them all and announces the prohibition against<br />

questioning as an axiomatic truth.<br />

The term “truth” itself is somewhat problematic, although I have<br />

used it as well. This is because of the age-old philosophical wisdom<br />

concerning the impossibility of being certain that one has found the<br />

truth. The reasons for this impossibility are twofold. On one hand there<br />

is the inadequacy of our senses and understanding, because of reasons<br />

that are primarily but not exclusively psychological. The other reason is<br />

that there is no such thing as valid “a priori” knowledge.<br />

Karl Popper makes this point very aptly: 77<br />

“First, although in science we do our best to find the truth, we<br />

are conscious of the fact that we can never be sure whether we have<br />

got it. We have learned in the past, through many disappointments,<br />

that we must not expect finality. And we have learned not to be dis-<br />

75 Peter Plichta, Benzin aus Sand. Die Silan-Revolution, 2nd ed., Herbig, Munich 2006, p. 248.<br />

76 34 leading French researchers, Le Monde, 21 Feb. 1979.<br />

77 Karl Popper, The Open…, op. cit. (note 70), vol. 2, p. 12.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!