Germar Rudolf, Resistance Is Obligatory (2012; PDF-Datei

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORY
the least bit interested in my scientific and chemical arguments, as they
were not quoting my book in order to take note of my arguments, let
alone criticize them, but merely as an example of historical theories
they felt obliged to refute.
Hence the Polish researchers deliberately and against the facts,
which must have been known to them, chose a method of analysis
which was incapable of detecting precisely that which – 40 years after
the end of the war – could only have been the object of contention,
namely long-term stable reaction products. It is therefore not surprising
that they were able to produce their desired results by using this deliberately
chosen incorrect method of analysis: all samples, regardless of
where taken, produced similar analytical results, which were practically
zero.
Thus the Poles, by using an incorrect method of analysis, eliminated
all those data which could have become unpleasant right from the outset.
Such a procedure is nothing other than scientific fraud, and that is
exactly what I accused them of publicly, after the Poles – confronted
with my questions and my critique – were unable to give scientific reasons
for their actions. 112 To this day I still have not received any response
to my accusation.
3. Arbitrary changes of terms and definitions
The tragedy of the alleged “code” or “camouflage” language belongs
in this category of immunization tactics of theories. According to established,
officially sanctioned historiography, the National Socialists are
supposed to have used this “code” language during the war in order to
hide their genocidal actions in their documents. Whereas expressions
such as “emigration,” “resettlements,” “deportation” etc., if used in
documents pertaining to the so-called “Jewish Question” up to the outbreak
of hostilities between Germany and the Soviet Union in June of
1941, expressed exactly what these words actually mean – there is general
consent about this – after this point it is claimed that there was a
sudden change in meaning of these terms, because from that point in
time onward these expressions are said to have become mere harmless
sounding euphemisms for mass murder.
112 Cf. Letter exchange between Prof. Markiewicz and me, first published in Sleipnir, issue 3/1995,
pp. 29-33; also in Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz Lies, The Barnes Review, Washington,
DC, 2011, pp. 56-65 (www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/18-al.pdf).
84